229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19761913)
1. Transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of the ramus-condyle unit of the temporomandibular joint: surgical technique.
Schwartz HC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2197-200. PubMed ID: 19761913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation.
Zheng LW; Ma L; Shi XJ; Zwahlen RA; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 21129836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of a neocondyle using transport distraction osteogenesis.
Stucki-McCormick SU; Fox RM; Mizrahi RD
Semin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 5(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 10371942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-stage technique for treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint, secondary micrognathia, and a prominent mandibular angle.
Jia W; He Y; Helal H; Wang Y; Li J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 57(7):701-703. PubMed ID: 31202512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of rabbit model with mandibular ramus shortening by distraction osteogenesis at condylar neck.
Meng Q; Yang X; Long X; Li J; Cai H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):931-40. PubMed ID: 21764198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of ramus following vertical lengthening with distraction osteogenesis.
Tuzuner-Oncul AM; Kisnisci RS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 39(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 21145754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint.
Stucki-McCormick SU; Winick R; Winick A
N Y State Dent J; 1998 Mar; 64(3):36-41. PubMed ID: 9577550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distraction osteogenesis for temporomandibular joint reconstruction.
Schwartz HC; Relle RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):718-23. PubMed ID: 18355596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis: comparison of treatment with transport distraction osteogenesis or the matthews device arthroplasty.
Gabbay JS; Heller JB; Song YY; Wasson KL; Harrington H; Bradley JP
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):516-22. PubMed ID: 16770191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of the mandibular condyle using transport distraction osteogenesis.
Stucki-McCormick SU
J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Jan; 8(1):48-52; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 10332299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transport distraction: mandibular reconstruction.
Stucki-McCormick SU; Fox R; Mizrahi R
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 11905332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction of mandibular condyle by transport distraction osteogenesis: Experimental study in rhesus monkey.
Zhu S; Hu J; Li J; Ying B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1487-92. PubMed ID: 16982306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transport distraction versus costochondral graft for reconstruction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: which is better?
Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Ma L; Shi XJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19451010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular reconstruction through transport distraction using intraoral appliance.
Andrade NN; Reshamwala SM; Subburaj K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2260-9. PubMed ID: 21435769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous costochondral ramus-condyle reconstruction and mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.
Morris R; Beckett J; Steinbacher DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):e541-6. PubMed ID: 22868035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical properties of the condyle created by osteodistraction.
Zhu S; Hu J; Zou S; Kakudo K; Tsunokuma M
J Dent Res; 2008 May; 87(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18434583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fibula flap reconstruction of the condyle in disarticulation resections of the mandible: a case report and review of the technique.
Engroff SL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 16301145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-step transport distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of unilateral large mandibular defects after tumour resection using internal distraction devices.
Wang JJ; Chen J; Ping FY; Yan Fg
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 22209499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in facial asymmetry patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis.
Yoon HJ; Kim HG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 31(5):544-8. PubMed ID: 12418572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats.
Zhou LB; Shang HT; Hu M; Li DC; Sigare S; Chen BL; Liu YP; Zhao JL
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 46(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 18336969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
