431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19762042)
1. A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence.
Henry GD; Graham SM; Cornell RJ; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Vakalopoulos I; Flynn B
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2404-9. PubMed ID: 19762042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach.
Henry GD; Graham SM; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Flynn B
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1475-9; discussion 1479. PubMed ID: 18295275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the penoscrotal approach inferior to the perineal approach for artificial sphincter implantation in male urinary incontinence? A preliminary experience.
Shen YC; Chiang PH
Int J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):786-9. PubMed ID: 22494163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical and manometric comparison of perineal and transscrotal approaches to artificial urinary sphincter placement.
Anusionwu I; Miles-Thomas J; Hernandez DJ; Wright EJ
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1834-6. PubMed ID: 22999695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter implantation: can the penoscrotal approach constitute an alternative to the perineal approach?].
Fassi-Fehri H; Dinia EM; Genevoix S; Murat FJ; Poissonnier L; Badet L; Colombel M; Martin X; Gelet A
Prog Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18472073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of penile and bulbospongiosus measurements: implications for artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement.
Schlomer BJ; Dugi DD; Valadez C; Morey AF
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20171696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach: G. D. Henry, S. M. Graham, M. A. Cleves, C. J. Simmons and B. Flynn J Urol 2008; 179: 1475-1479.
Siegel A
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):417; author reply 417-8. PubMed ID: 19019394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting the penoscrotal approach to artificial urinary sphincter surgery: how does it compare to a perineal incision for initial implantation?
Staniorski CJ; Singal A; Nettey O; Yura E; Keeter MK; Kielb S; Hofer MD
World J Urol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):871-876. PubMed ID: 32440696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results.
Magera JS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1015-9; discussion 1019-20. PubMed ID: 17296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation by a single surgeon in 15 years.
Shen YC; Chiang PH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2013 Mar; 29(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 23465419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence.
Hudak SJ; Morey AF
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1962-6. PubMed ID: 21944140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the perineal and penoscrotal approaches in artificial urinary sphincter implantation for the control of male stress urinary incontinence.
Altaweel W; Almesned R; Seyam R
Ann Saudi Med; 2023; 43(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 36739496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of penoscrotal and perineal approaches for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in man].
Brierre T; Roumiguie M; Soulie M; Rischmann P; Thoulouzan M; Game X
Prog Urol; 2021 Dec; 31(17):1182-1191. PubMed ID: 34801387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy.
Simhan J; Morey AF; Zhao LC; Tausch TJ; Scott JF; Hudak SJ; Mazzarella BC
J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):798-803. PubMed ID: 24746880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.
O'Connor RC; Lyon MB; Guralnick ML; Bales GT
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 18242372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Kabalin JN
J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1302-4. PubMed ID: 8808859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion occurs predominantly in irradiated patients.
Simhan J; Morey AF; Singla N; Tausch TJ; Scott JF; Lemack GE; Roehrborn CG
J Urol; 2015 Feb; 193(2):593-7. PubMed ID: 25106901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bone-anchored male sling and collagen implant for the treatment of male incontinence.
Onur R; Singla A
Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1207-11. PubMed ID: 16984554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
