BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19762164)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of techniques to reduce the bulk of lacerated flexor tendon ends within digital sheaths of the porcine forelimb.
    Vigler M; Lee SK; Palti R; Williams JC; Kaminsky AJ; Posner MA; Hausman MR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 34(9):1653-8. PubMed ID: 19762164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.
    Vigler M; Palti R; Goldstein R; Patel VP; Nasser P; Lee SK
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 19084186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength of tendon repair decreases in the presence of an intact A2 pulley: biomechanical study in a chicken model.
    Cao Y; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1763-70. PubMed ID: 19969186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zone I flexor digitorum profundus repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of tendon to bone repair in cadavera.
    Dovan TT; Gelberman RH; Kusano N; Calcaterra M; Silva MJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15781347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of partial versus complete circumferential repair on flexor tendon strength in cadavers.
    Ansari U; Lawson RD; Peterson JL; Appleyard RC; Tonkin MA
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19969187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single side locking on the opposite of the modified Kessler tendon repair prevents gap formation and suture pull-out: a biomechanical evaluation in sheep tendons.
    Doğramaci Y; Kalaci A; Sevinç TT; Süner G; Emir A; Yanat AN
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2009; 20(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 19619114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary tendon sheath enlargement and reconstruction in zone 2: an in vitro biomechanical study on tendon gliding resistance.
    Bunata RE; Kosmopoulos V; Simmons S; Tayag TJ; Roso M; Carlson H
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1436-43. PubMed ID: 19695797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of A2 pulley release on repaired tendon gliding resistance and rupture in a chicken model.
    Tang JB; Cao Y; Wu YF; Wang GH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009; 34(6):1080-7. PubMed ID: 19643293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gliding characteristics of tendon repair in canine flexor digitorum profundus tendons.
    Zhao C; Amadio PC; Zobitz ME; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Jul; 19(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 11518265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Zone II tendon repairs augmented with autogenous dorsal tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slade JF; Bhargava M; Barrie KA; Shenbagamurthi D; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):813-20. PubMed ID: 11561232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs.
    Cao Y; Zhu B; Xie RG; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 31(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 16443114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study.
    Gill RS; Lim BH; Shatford RA; Toth E; Voor MJ; Tsai TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Nov; 24(6):1315-22. PubMed ID: 10584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs.
    Tang JB; Zhang Y; Cao Y; Xie RG
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 30(6):1262-6. PubMed ID: 16344186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of direction of tendon lacerations on strength of tendon repairs.
    Tan J; Wang B; Xu Y; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 12671854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
    McCallister WV; Ambrose HC; Katolik LI; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 31(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 16473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile properties of suture methods for repair of partially lacerated human flexor tendon in vitro.
    Zobitz ME; Zhao C; Erhard L; Amadio PC; An KN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):821-7. PubMed ID: 11561233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical assessment of repair versus nonrepair of sheep flexor tendons lacerated to 75 percent.
    Haddad R; Scherman P; Peltz T; Nicklin S; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 20189731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler techniques.
    Wolfe SW; Willis AA; Campbell D; Clabeaux J; Wright TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 32(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17336844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new 4-strand flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric porcine model.
    Manchio JV; Shashikant MP; Shrivastava A; Weinzweig J; Vernadakis AJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 34(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 19058923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.