These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19762428)

  • 1. Auditory midbrain implant: a review.
    Lim HH; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Sep; 13(3):149-80. PubMed ID: 19762428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():212-23. PubMed ID: 25613994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological validation of a human prototype auditory midbrain implant in a guinea pig model.
    Lenarz M; Lim HH; Patrick JF; Anderson DJ; Lenarz T
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 7(4):383-98. PubMed ID: 17075701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The auditory midbrain implant: a new auditory prosthesis for neural deafness-concept and device description.
    Lenarz T; Lim HH; Reuter G; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 16936570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural representation in the auditory midbrain of the envelope of vocalizations based on a peripheral ear model.
    Rode T; Hartmann T; Hubka P; Scheper V; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Kral A; Lim HH
    Front Neural Circuits; 2013; 7():166. PubMed ID: 24155694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical stimulation of the midbrain for hearing restoration: insight into the functional organization of the human central auditory system.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Samii A; Samii M; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    J Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 27(49):13541-51. PubMed ID: 18057212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The first successful case of hearing produced by electrical stimulation of the human midbrain.
    Colletti V; Shannon R; Carner M; Sacchetto L; Turazzi S; Masotto B; Colletti L
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17195744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The auditory midbrain implant: effects of electrode location.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Anderson DJ; Lenarz M
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):74-85. PubMed ID: 18348902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
    Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Central auditory prosthesis].
    Lenarz T; Lim H; Joseph G; Reuter G; Lenarz M
    HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):551-62. PubMed ID: 19517084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.
    Pfingst BE; Bowling SA; Colesa DJ; Garadat SN; Raphael Y; Shibata SB; Strahl SB; Su GL; Zhou N
    Hear Res; 2011 Nov; 281(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 21605648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.
    Holden LK; Reeder RM; Firszt JB; Finley CC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):255-69. PubMed ID: 21275500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Jones GL; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23297914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.
    Anderson CA; Lazard DS; Hartley DE
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():138-149. PubMed ID: 27473501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.
    Bierer JA
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Jun; 14(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 20724356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.