358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19762529)
1. Usefulness of a synoptic data tool for reporting of head and neck neoplasms based on the College of American Pathologists cancer checklists.
Kang HP; Devine LJ; Piccoli AL; Seethala RR; Amin W; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 132(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 19762529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma.
Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.
Mohanty SK; Piccoli AL; Devine LJ; Patel AA; William GC; Winters SB; Becich MJ; Parwani AV
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jul; 7():144. PubMed ID: 17672904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendations for the reporting of gastric carcinoma.
Robert ME; Lamps L; Lauwers GY;
Hum Pathol; 2008 Jan; 39(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17967475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.
Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A synoptic reporting system for peripheral blood smear interpretation.
Jaso J; Nguyen A; Nguyen AN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 135(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 21350088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synoptic pathology reporting for thyroid cancer: a review and institutional experience.
Lam E; Vy N; Bajdik C; Strugnell SS; Walker B; Wiseman SM
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1073-9. PubMed ID: 24053206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with gastric carcinoma: a basis for checklists. Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force for Protocols on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Gastric Cancer.
Compton C; Sobin LH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 122(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9448011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is needed to satisfy the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (COC) requirements for the pathologic reporting of cancer specimens?
Connolly JL; Fletcher CD
Hum Pathol; 2003 Feb; 34(2):111. PubMed ID: 12612876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer biomarkers: the role of structured data reporting.
Simpson RW; Berman MA; Foulis PR; Divaris DX; Birdsong GG; Mirza J; Moldwin R; Spencer S; Srigley JR; Fitzgibbons PL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 25275812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories.
Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L; Jones MA; Ye J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20670135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
