236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19762843)
1. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Weigel KA; de los Campos G; González-Recio O; Naya H; Wu XL; Long N; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5248-57. PubMed ID: 19762843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle.
Weigel KA; de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Van Tassell CP
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5423-35. PubMed ID: 20965358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic markers for lactation persistency in primiparous Australian dairy cows.
Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Verbyla K; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2202-14. PubMed ID: 20412936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle.
Olson KM; Vanraden PM; Tooker ME; Cooper TA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2613-20. PubMed ID: 21524553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers.
Moser G; Khatkar MS; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Oct; 42(1):37. PubMed ID: 20950478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins.
Vazquez AI; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; de los Campos G; Gianola D; Allison DB
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5942-9. PubMed ID: 21094768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fine-mapping quantitative trait loci for twinning rate on Bos taurus chromosome 14 in North American Holsteins.
Bierman CD; Kim E; Weigel K; Berger PJ; Kirkpatrick BW
J Anim Sci; 2010 Aug; 88(8):2556-64. PubMed ID: 20348381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms.
Weigel KA; Hoffman PC; Herring W; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2215-25. PubMed ID: 22459867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit.
Amer PR; Banos G
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jul; 93(7):3320-30. PubMed ID: 20630248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive ability of selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
Weller JI; Glick G; Shirak A; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Shemesh M; Zeron Y; Ron M
Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 24433958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada.
Wiggans GR; Sonstegard TS; VanRaden PM; Matukumalli LK; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Schenkel FS; Van Tassell CP
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3431-6. PubMed ID: 19528621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
