BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

981 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19764063)

  • 1. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
    Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of electrical field-induced flow reversal in a microchannel.
    Pirat C; Naso A; van der Wouden EJ; Gardeniers JG; Lohse D; van den Berg A
    Lab Chip; 2008 Jun; 8(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 18497916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fabrication and analysis of spatially uniform field electrokinetic flow devices: theory and experiment.
    Skulan AJ; Barrett LM; Singh AK; Cummings EB; Fiechtner GJ
    Anal Chem; 2005 Nov; 77(21):6790-7. PubMed ID: 16255575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model based design of a microfluidic mixer driven by induced charge electroosmosis.
    Harnett CK; Templeton J; Dunphy-Guzman KA; Senousy YM; Kanouff MP
    Lab Chip; 2008 Apr; 8(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 18369511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microfluidic T-form mixer utilizing switching electroosmotic flow.
    Lin CH; Fu LM; Chien YS
    Anal Chem; 2004 Sep; 76(18):5265-72. PubMed ID: 15362882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dielectrophoretic focusing of particles in a microchannel constriction using DC-biased AC flectric fields.
    Zhu J; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Aug; 30(15):2668-75. PubMed ID: 19621378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative characterization of magnetic separators: comparison of systems with and without integrated microfluidic mixers.
    Lund-Olesen T; Bruus H; Hansen MF
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Apr; 9(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 17165127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixing of non-Newtonian fluids in wavy serpentine microchannel using electrokinetically driven flow.
    Cho CC; Chen CL; Chen CK
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Mar; 33(5):743-50. PubMed ID: 22522530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-efficiency electrokinetic micromixing through symmetric sequential injection and expansion.
    Coleman JT; McKechnie J; Sinton D
    Lab Chip; 2006 Aug; 6(8):1033-9. PubMed ID: 16874374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixing enhancement of the passive microfluidic mixer with J-shaped baffles in the tee channel.
    Lin YC; Chung YC; Wu CY
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Apr; 9(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 17165126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical analysis of a rapid magnetic microfluidic mixer.
    Wen CY; Liang KP; Chen H; Fu LM
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Nov; 32(22):3268-76. PubMed ID: 22102500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrokinetically-driven flow mixing in microchannels with wavy surface.
    Chen CK; Cho CC
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2007 Aug; 312(2):470-80. PubMed ID: 17442332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numeric simulation of heat transfer and electrokinetic flow in an electroosmosis-based continuous flow PCR chip.
    Gui L; Ren CL
    Anal Chem; 2006 Sep; 78(17):6215-22. PubMed ID: 16944904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micromixer utilizing electrokinetic instability-induced shedding effect.
    Tai CH; Yang RJ; Huang MZ; Liu CW; Tsai CH; Fu LM
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Dec; 27(24):4982-90. PubMed ID: 17109376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated electric valve for electrokinetic separation in a networked microfluidic chip.
    Cui H; Huang Z; Dutta P; Ivory CF
    Anal Chem; 2007 Feb; 79(4):1456-65. PubMed ID: 17297944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joule heating effects on electroosmotic flow in insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Sridharan S; Zhu J; Hu G; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(17):2274-81. PubMed ID: 21792988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of three AC electroosmotic flow protocols for mixing in microfluidic channel.
    Chen JK; Weng CN; Yang RJ
    Lab Chip; 2009 May; 9(9):1267-73. PubMed ID: 19370247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of passive mixers utilizing microfluidic self-circulation in the mixing chamber.
    Chung YC; Hsu YL; Jen CP; Lu MC; Lin YC
    Lab Chip; 2004 Feb; 4(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 15007444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical and experimental evaluation of microfluidic sorting devices.
    Taylor JK; Ren CL; Stubley GD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):981-91. PubMed ID: 19194907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrokinetic flow control in microfluidic chips using a field-effect transistor.
    Horiuchi K; Dutta P
    Lab Chip; 2006 Jun; 6(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 16738721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.