410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19764082)
1. Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
Wait KR; Cloud BA; Forster LA; Jones TM; Nokleby JJ; Wolfe CR; Youdas JW
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 19764082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer teaching among physical therapy students during human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
Youdas JW; Hoffarth BL; Kohlwey SR; Kramer CM; Petro JL
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):199-206. PubMed ID: 19177411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students.
Youdas JW; Krause DA; Hellyer NJ; Rindflesch AB; Hollman JH
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 23509010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning.
Evans DJ; Cuffe T
Anat Sci Educ; 2009 Oct; 2(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 19753627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.
Camp CL; Gregory JK; Lachman N; Chen LP; Juskewitch JE; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 20213851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory.
Brueckner JK; MacPherson BR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 May; 8(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 15059083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The physical therapy undergraduate students' responses to the gross human anatomy subjects].
Anahara R; Kawashiro Y; Matsuno Y; Mori C; Kohno T
Kaibogaku Zasshi; 2008 Sep; 83(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 18807947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course.
Bukowski EL
J Allied Health; 2002; 31(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12227266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence.
Lockspeiser TM; O'Sullivan P; Teherani A; Muller J
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Aug; 13(3):361-72. PubMed ID: 17124627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Humanities in Gross Anatomy Project: a novel humanistic learning tool at Des Moines University.
Canby CA; Bush TA
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 20143400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A controlled trial of peer-teaching in practical gross anatomy.
Nnodim JO
Clin Anat; 1997; 10(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 9058018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fostering interprofessional teamwork in an academic medical center: Near-peer education for students during gross medical anatomy.
Shields RK; Pizzimenti MA; Dudley-Javoroski S; Schwinn DA
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 24888728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovative activities for teaching anatomy of speech production.
Skinder-Meredith AE
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):234-43. PubMed ID: 20740622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Krych AJ; March CN; Bryan RE; Peake BJ; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW
Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 15832347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.
Nieder GL; Parmelee DX; Stolfi A; Hudes PD
Clin Anat; 2005 Jan; 18(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 15597377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
