388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19764167)
1. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise.
Kuk F; Keenan D; Korhonen P; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):465-79. PubMed ID: 19764167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise.
Kuk F; Peeters H; Lau C; Korhonen P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 21756842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.
Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P; Seper E; Hau O
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):590-606. PubMed ID: 30420004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a Wind Noise Attenuation Algorithm on Subjective Annoyance and Speech-in-Wind Performance.
Korhonen P; Kuk F; Seper E; Mørkebjerg M; Roikjer M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 28054911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Rakszawski B; Wright R; Cadieux JH; Davidson LS; Brenner C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.
Atcherson SR; Mendel LL; Baltimore WJ; Patro C; Lee S; Pousson M; Spann MJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28054912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.
Jenkins KA; Fodor C; Presacco A; Anderson S
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):810-824. PubMed ID: 29287038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in sensation level between the Widex Soundtracker and two real-ear analyzers.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):660-70. PubMed ID: 24131602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions.
Mackersie CL; Crocker TL; Davis RA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(7):498-507. PubMed ID: 15484599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
