These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19764168)

  • 1. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
    Kuk FK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relief of the occluded ear sensation to improve earmold comfort.
    French-Saint George M; Barr-Hamilton RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 721670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.
    Winkler A; Latzel M; Holube I
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26879562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs - all a matter of opening the ear canal?
    Denk F; Hieke T; Roberz M; Husstedt H
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 35254186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Acoustics of Instant Ear Tips and Their Implications for Hearing-Aid Fitting.
    Cubick J; Caporali S; Lelic D; Catic J; Vikær Damsgaard A; Rose S; Ives T; Schmidt E
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1771-1782. PubMed ID: 35733244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open earmold fittings for improving aided auditory localization for sensorineural hearing losses with good high-frequency hearing.
    Byrne D; Sinclair S; Noble W
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 9504273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response.
    Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 7060839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vent configurations on subjective and objective occlusion effect.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):747-62. PubMed ID: 16515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems.
    Kiessling J; Brenner B; Jespersen CT; Groth J; Jensen OD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):237-49. PubMed ID: 16050334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The occlusion effect in unilateral versus bilateral hearing aids.
    Jespersen CT; Groth J; Kiessling J; Brenner B; Jensen OD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):763-73. PubMed ID: 17153723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coupling of FM systems to individuals with unilateral hearing loss.
    Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG; Carney E; Schulte L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 1735969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance.
    Munro KJ; Hatton N
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10708074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-world performance of a reverse-horn vent.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC; Dinulescu N; Cortez R; Keogh P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):653-61. PubMed ID: 16515137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging for Obtaining Ear Impressions for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Chen CK; Hsieh LC; Chiang YC; Cheng WD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):666-671. PubMed ID: 31060451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.