125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19764232)
1. Determining the probability of arsenic in groundwater using a parsimonious model.
Lee JJ; Jang CS; Liu CW; Liang CP; Wang SW
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 43(17):6662-8. PubMed ID: 19764232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial analysis of the risk to human health from exposure to arsenic contaminated groundwater: A kriging approach.
Liang CP; Chen JS; Chien YC; Chen CF
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():1048-1057. PubMed ID: 29426124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study on arsenic and humic substances in alluvial aquifers of Bengal delta plain (NW Bangladesh), Chianan plain (SW Taiwan) and Lanyang plain (NE Taiwan): implication of arsenic mobilization mechanisms.
Selim Reza AH; Jean JS; Yang HJ; Lee MK; Hsu HF; Liu CC; Lee YC; Bundschuh J; Lin KH; Lee CY
Environ Geochem Health; 2011 Jun; 33(3):235-58. PubMed ID: 20706862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of arsenic contamination potential using indicator kriging in the Yun-Lin aquifer (Taiwan).
Liu CW; Jang CS; Liao CM
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Apr; 321(1-3):173-88. PubMed ID: 15050394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arsenic-enriched groundwaters of India, Bangladesh and Taiwan--comparison of hydrochemical characteristics and mobility constraints.
Maity JP; Nath B; Chen CY; Bhattacharya P; Sracek O; Bundschuh J; Kar S; Thunvik R; Chatterjee D; Ahmed KM; Jacks G; Mukherjee AB; Jean JS
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2011; 46(11):1163-76. PubMed ID: 21879849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of organic matter on arsenic mobilization into groundwater: evidence from northwestern (Chapai-Nawabganj), central (Manikganj) and southeastern (Chandpur) Bangladesh.
Reza AH; Jean JS; Lee MK; Liu CC; Bundschuh J; Yang HJ; Lee JF; Lee YC
Water Res; 2010 Nov; 44(19):5556-74. PubMed ID: 20875661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the probability of arsenic in groundwater in New England as a tool for exposure assessment.
Ayotte JD; Nolan BT; Nuckols JR; Cantor KP; Robinson GR; Baris D; Hayes L; Karagas M; Bress W; Silverman DT; Lubin JH
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(11):3578-85. PubMed ID: 16786697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of potential health risk of arsenic-affected groundwater using indicator kriging and dose response model.
Lee JJ; Jang CS; Wang SW; Liu CW
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):151-62. PubMed ID: 17628636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution and variability of redox zones controlling spatial variability of arsenic in the Mississippi River Valley alluvial aquifer, southeastern Arkansas.
Sharif MU; Davis RK; Steele KF; Kim B; Hays PD; Kresse TM; Fazio JA
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jul; 99(1-4):49-67. PubMed ID: 18486990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arsenic in groundwater and sediment in the Mekong River delta, Vietnam.
Hoang TH; Bang S; Kim KW; Nguyen MH; Dang DM
Environ Pollut; 2010 Aug; 158(8):2648-58. PubMed ID: 20605297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pollutant sources in an arsenic-affected multilayer aquifer in the Po Plain of Italy: Implications for drinking-water supply.
Rotiroti M; McArthur J; Fumagalli L; Stefania GA; Sacchi E; Bonomi T
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 578():502-512. PubMed ID: 27836337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geochemistry of high arsenic groundwater in Chia-Nan plain, Southwestern Taiwan: possible sources and reactive transport of arsenic.
Nath B; Jean JS; Lee MK; Yang HJ; Liu CC
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jul; 99(1-4):85-96. PubMed ID: 18572272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geochemistry of redox-sensitive elements and sulfur isotopes in the high arsenic groundwater system of Datong Basin, China.
Xie X; Ellis A; Wang Y; Xie Z; Duan M; Su C
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jun; 407(12):3823-35. PubMed ID: 19344934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobilization of arsenic and other naturally occurring contaminants in groundwater of the Main Ethiopian Rift aquifers.
Rango T; Vengosh A; Dwyer G; Bianchini G
Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5801-18. PubMed ID: 23899878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arsenic behavior in newly drilled wells.
Kim MJ; Nriagu J; Haack S
Chemosphere; 2003 Jul; 52(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 12738300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Principal Components Analysis and Kriging to Predict Groundwater-Sourced Rural Drinking Water Quality in Saskatchewan.
McLeod L; Bharadwaj L; Epp T; Waldner CL
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 28914824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping of spatial multi-scale sources of arsenic variation in groundwater on ChiaNan floodplain of Taiwan.
Lin YB; Lin YP; Liu CW; Tan YC
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct; 370(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16904165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Origin of arsenic in groundwater from the multilayer aquifer in Cremona (northern Italy).
Rotiroti M; Sacchi E; Fumagalli L; Bonomi T
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(10):5395-403. PubMed ID: 24779916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the accuracy of kriging and IDW interpolations in estimating groundwater arsenic concentrations in Texas.
Gong G; Mattevada S; O'Bryant SE
Environ Res; 2014 Apr; 130():59-69. PubMed ID: 24559533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissolved and solid-phase arsenic fate in an arsenic-enriched aquifer in the river Brahmaputra alluvial plain.
Baviskar S; Choudhury R; Mahanta C
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Mar; 187(3):93. PubMed ID: 25663398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
