BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19765699)

  • 1. Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2037-2052. PubMed ID: 36274514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What makes distributed practice effective?
    Benjamin AS; Tullis J
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Nov; 61(3):228-47. PubMed ID: 20580350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test position effects on hit and false alarm rates in recognition memory for paintings and words.
    Fallow KM; Lindsay DS
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):378-396. PubMed ID: 34558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Pardini AM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):842-854. PubMed ID: 30790209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):266-278. PubMed ID: 30288686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of criterion shifting in recognition memory is task dependent.
    Franks BA; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 27400995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Malmberg KJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 25117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is what goes in what comes out? Encoding and retrieval event-related potentials together determine memory outcome.
    Chen YY; Lithgow K; Hemmerich JA; Caplan JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3175-90. PubMed ID: 24929938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Starns JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):742-54. PubMed ID: 24523046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2014 Jan; 70():36-52. PubMed ID: 24459327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.
    Criss AH; Wheeler ME; McClelland JL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 23092213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some Memories are Odder than Others: Judgments of Episodic Oddity Violate Known Decision Rules.
    O'Connor AR; Guhl EN; Cox JC; Dobbins IG
    J Mem Lang; 2011 May; 64(4):299-315. PubMed ID: 22833695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1189-99. PubMed ID: 22736423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; White CN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1137-51. PubMed ID: 22545609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2010 Jul; 63(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 20582147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.