These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Managing varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical varicocelectomy. Schiff J; Kelly C; Goldstein M; Schlegel P; Poppas D BJU Int; 2005 Feb; 95(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15679802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dye assisted lymphatic sparing subinguinal varicocelectomy. A prospective randomized study. Abd Ellatif ME; El Nakeeb A; Shoma AM; Abbas AE; Askar W; Noman N Int J Surg; 2011; 9(8):626-31. PubMed ID: 21875697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: sequential comparison of 4 techniques. Riccabona M; Oswald J; Koen M; Lusuardi L; Radmayr C; Bartsch G J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):666-8. PubMed ID: 12544340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in the adolescent: technique and preliminary results. Minevich E; Wacksman J; Lewis AG; Sheldon CA J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1022-4. PubMed ID: 9474223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents. Yaman O; Soygur T; Zumrutbas AE; Resorlu B Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):410-2. PubMed ID: 16904464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Al-Kandari AM; Shabaan H; Ibrahim HM; Elshebiny YH; Shokeir AA Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial. Schwentner C; Oswald J; Lunacek A; Deibl M; Bartsch G; Radmayr C J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1049-52. PubMed ID: 16469616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results and complications of adolescent varicocele repair with intraoperative sodium morrhuate sclerotherapy. Lebed B; Packer M; Husmann D; Zaontz M J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1837-41. PubMed ID: 18721963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Ghanem H; Anis T; El-Nashar A; Shamloul R Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15533495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing concepts in microsurgical pediatric varicocelectomy: is retroperitoneal approach better than subinguinal one? Silveri M; Bassani F; Adorisio O Urol J; 2015 Feb; 12(1):2032-5. PubMed ID: 25703914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital. Cayan S; Acar D; Ulger S; Akbay E J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):2003-6; discussion 2006-7. PubMed ID: 16217378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observations on hydroceles following adolescent varicocelectomy. Nees SN; Glassberg KI J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2402-7. PubMed ID: 22019156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during laparoscopic varicocelectomy: early results. Rabah DM; Adwan AA; Seida MA Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4826-30. PubMed ID: 19796458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long term outcomes of lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Rizkala E; Fishman A; Gitlin J; Zelkovic P; Franco I J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Aug; 9(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 23498876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]