267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19766072)
21. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience.
Rosenthal G; Ng I; Moscovici S; Lee KK; Lay T; Martin C; Manley GT
Neurosurgery; 2014 Nov; 75(5):523-9; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 24979096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multidisciplinary approach for improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction: introducing the pericranial-onlay cranioplasty technique.
Gordon CR; Fisher M; Liauw J; Lina I; Puvanesarajah V; Susarla S; Coon A; Lim M; Quinones-Hinojosa A; Weingart J; Colby G; Olivi A; Huang J
Neurosurgery; 2014 Jun; 10 Suppl 2(0 2):179-89; discussion 189-90. PubMed ID: 24448187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants.
Gerbino G; Zavattero E; Zenga F; Bianchi FA; Garzino-Demo P; Berrone S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26242698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reconstruction of cranial defects with individually formed cranial prostheses made of polypropylene polyester knitwear: an analysis of 48 consecutive patients.
Kasprzak P; Tomaszewski G; Kotwica Z; Kwinta B; Zwoliński J
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1084-9. PubMed ID: 22320208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient-Specific Titanium-Reinforced Calcium Phosphate Implant for the Repair and Healing of Complex Cranial Defects.
Kihlström Burenstam Linder L; Birgersson U; Lundgren K; Illies C; Engstrand T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e399-e407. PubMed ID: 30342265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Craniofacial reconstruction with computer-generated HTR patient-matched implants: use in primary bony tumor excision.
Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 13(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 12218793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fabrication of Patient Specific Titanium Implants for Correction of Cranial Defects: A Technique to Improve Anatomic Contours and Accuracy.
Nagarjuna M; Ganesh P; Srinivasaiah VS; Kumar K; Shetty S; Salins PC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2409-11. PubMed ID: 26491922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Warfare-related craniectomy defect reconstruction: early success using custom alloplast implants.
Kumar AR; Bradley JP; Harshbarger R; Stevens F; Bell R; Moores L; Armonda R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1279-1287. PubMed ID: 21364428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Translucent Customized Cranial Implants Made of Clear Polymethylmethacrylate: An Early Outcome Analysis of 55 Consecutive Cranioplasty Cases.
Shay T; Mitchell KA; Belzberg M; Zelko I; Mahapatra S; Qian J; Mendoza L; Huang J; Brem H; Gordon C
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 85(6):e27-e36. PubMed ID: 33170582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical results of cranioplasty using three-dimensional printing technology.
Cheng CH; Chuang HY; Lin HL; Liu CL; Yao CH
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 May; 168():118-123. PubMed ID: 29549811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cranioplasty With Customized Craniofacial Implants and Intraoperative Resizing for Single-Stage Reconstruction Following Oncologic Resection of Skull Neoplasms.
Ben-Shalom N; Asemota AO; Beizberg M; Harnof S; Huang J; Lim M; Brem H; Gordon C
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 33(6):1641-1647. PubMed ID: 35288504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature.
Williams LR; Fan KF; Bentley RP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 25482456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pediatric Cranioplasty.
Bykowski MR; Goldstein JA; Losee JE
Clin Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 46(2):173-183. PubMed ID: 30851749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 3D surface accuracy of CAD generated skull defect contour.
Winder RJ; McKnight W; McRitchie I; Montgomery D; Wulf J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():574-6. PubMed ID: 16404124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In Situ Cranioplasty Technique for Immediate Calvarial Reconstruction to Optimize Cosmesis.
Gallia GL
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():535-9. PubMed ID: 26875659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
