BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19766156)

  • 1. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
    Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toxicological information on chemicals published in the Russian language: Contribution to REACH and 3Rs.
    Sihtmäe M; Dubourguier HC; Kahru A
    Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 262(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19433131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing.
    Gubbels-van Hal WM; Blaauboer BJ; Barentsen HM; Hoitink MA; Meerts IA; van der Hoeven JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Aug; 42(3):284-95. PubMed ID: 15979772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
    Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization of animal studies to determine the effects and human risks of environmental toxicants (drugs, chemicals, and physical agents).
    Brent RL
    Pediatrics; 2004 Apr; 113(4 Suppl):984-95. PubMed ID: 15060191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: current status and future potential.
    Winkler DA; Mombelli E; Pietroiusti A; Tran L; Worth A; Fadeel B; McCall MJ
    Toxicology; 2013 Nov; 313(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 23165187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
    Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.
    Schultz TW; Carlson RE; Cronin MT; Hermens JL; Johnson R; O'Brien PJ; Roberts DW; Siraki A; Wallace KB; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 16920662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In silico-aided prediction of biological properties of chemicals: oestrogen receptor-mediated effects.
    Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    Chem Soc Rev; 2008 Mar; 37(3):441-50. PubMed ID: 18224255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A discussion of the impact of US chemical regulation legislation on the field of toxicity testing.
    Sullivan K; Beck N; Sandusky C; Willett C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 21624455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tiered chemical testing: a value of information approach.
    Yokota F; Gray G; Hammitt JK; Thompson KM
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1625-39. PubMed ID: 15660617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental and mathematical modeling methods for the investigation of toxicological interactions.
    El-Masri HA
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 223(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16996550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.