292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19766535)
1. Mechanisms controlling motor output to a transfer hand after learning a sequential pinch force skill with the opposite hand.
Camus M; Ragert P; Vandermeeren Y; Cohen LG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 120(10):1859-65. PubMed ID: 19766535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.
Perez MA; Cohen LG
J Neurosci; 2008 May; 28(22):5631-40. PubMed ID: 18509024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in transfer of procedural knowledge.
Perez MA; Wise SP; Willingham DT; Cohen LG
J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(5):1045-53. PubMed ID: 17267558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with altered activity-dependent modulation of short-interval intracortical inhibition in bilateral M1.
Morin-Moncet O; Latulipe-Loiselle A; Therrien-Blanchet JM; Theoret H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197505. PubMed ID: 29856758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural mechanisms underlying the changes in ipsilateral primary motor cortex excitability during unilateral rhythmic muscle contraction.
Uehara K; Morishita T; Kubota S; Funase K
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 240():33-45. PubMed ID: 23174210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Motor cortex excitability is not differentially modulated following skill and strength training.
Leung M; Rantalainen T; Teo WP; Kidgell D
Neuroscience; 2015 Oct; 305():99-108. PubMed ID: 26259901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modulation of effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor cortex (M1) by conditioning stimulation of the opposite M1.
Ragert P; Camus M; Vandermeeren Y; Dimyan MA; Cohen LG
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 102(2):766-73. PubMed ID: 19474173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymmetrical facilitation of motor-evoked potentials following motor practice.
Hammond GR; Vallence AM
Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):805-7. PubMed ID: 16708018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric differences in use-dependent corticomotor plasticity in young and old adults.
Cirillo J; Rogasch NC; Semmler JG
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 205(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 20574685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intracortical facilitation and inhibition in human primary motor cortex during motor skill acquisition.
Ho K; Cirillo J; Ren A; Byblow WD
Exp Brain Res; 2022 Dec; 240(12):3289-3304. PubMed ID: 36308563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral intracortical inhibition during unilateral motor preparation and sequence learning.
Hamel R; Waltzing BM; Hinder MR; McAllister CJ; Jenkinson N; Galea JM
Brain Stimul; 2024; 17(2):349-361. PubMed ID: 38479713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical illusion alters M1 excitability after mirror therapy: a TMS study.
Läppchen CH; Ringer T; Blessin J; Seidel G; Grieshammer S; Lange R; Hamzei F
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Nov; 108(10):2857-61. PubMed ID: 22972955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contralateral and Ipsilateral Relationships between Intracortical Inhibition and Stopping Efficiency.
Chowdhury NS; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
Neuroscience; 2019 Sep; 415():10-17. PubMed ID: 31302263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of slow repetitive TMS of the motor cortex on ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements and motor skill learning.
Kobayashi M
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(4):437-48. PubMed ID: 20714068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine-motor manipulation task.
Morishita T; Uehara K; Funase K
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(11):3086-94. PubMed ID: 22422998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term immobilization influences use-dependent cortical plasticity and fine motor performance.
Opie GM; Evans A; Ridding MC; Semmler JG
Neuroscience; 2016 Aug; 330():247-56. PubMed ID: 27282084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased excitability and reduced intracortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during a fine-motor manipulation task.
Morishita T; Ninomiya M; Uehara K; Funase K
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1371():65-73. PubMed ID: 21093420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning.
Garry MI; Kamen G; Nordstrom MA
J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1570-8. PubMed ID: 14627660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Co-activation of primary motor cortex ipsilateral to muscles contracting in a unilateral motor task.
Chiou SY; Wang RY; Liao KK; Wu YT; Lu CF; Yang YR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jul; 124(7):1353-63. PubMed ID: 23478202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motor learning and cross-limb transfer rely upon distinct neural adaptation processes.
Stöckel T; Carroll TJ; Summers JJ; Hinder MR
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):575-86. PubMed ID: 27169508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
