These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1976679)

  • 21. In-use efficacy of a chlorhexidine in alcohol surgical rub: a comparative study.
    Grabsch EA; Mitchell DJ; Hooper J; Turnidge JD
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Sep; 74(9):769-72. PubMed ID: 15379808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].
    Buluş N; Kaleli I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):137-43. PubMed ID: 15293913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The efficacy of three hand asepsis techniques using chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG 2%)].
    da Cunha ÉR; Matos FG; da Silva AM; de Araújo EA; Ferreira KA; Graziano KU
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2011 Dec; 45(6):1440-5. PubMed ID: 22241204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lack of sustained efficacy for alcohol-based surgical hand rubs containing 'residual active ingredients' according to EN 12791.
    Kampf G; Kramer A; Suchomel M
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Feb; 95(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 27912980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The antiseptic efficacy of chlorxylenol-containing vs. chlorhexidine gluconate-containing surgical scrub preparations.
    Soulsby ME; Barnett JB; Maddox S
    Infect Control; 1986 Apr; 7(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 3634761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of five surgical hand scrub preparations.
    Paulson DS
    AORN J; 1994 Aug; 60(2):246, 249-56. PubMed ID: 7944323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preoperative Hand Decontamination in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparison of the Removal of Bacteria from Surgeons' Hands by Routine Antimicrobial Scrub versus an Alcoholic Hand Rub.
    Forer Y; Block C; Frenkel S
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Sep; 42(9):1333-1337. PubMed ID: 28557536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evaluation of residual antimicrobial activity on hands and its clinical relevance.
    Wade JJ; Casewell MW
    J Hosp Infect; 1991 Jun; 18 Suppl B():23-8. PubMed ID: 1679443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vivo evaluation of the persistant and residual antimicrobial properties of three hand-scrub and hand-rub regimes in a simulated surgical environment.
    Beausoleil CM; Paulson DS; Bogert A; Lewis GS
    J Hosp Infect; 2012 Aug; 81(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 22705298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the residual activity of antiseptic handrub lotions: an 'in use' setting study.
    Namura S; Nishijima S; Asada Y
    J Dermatol; 1994 Jul; 21(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 8089367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands.
    Weber DJ; Sickbert-Bennett E; Gergen MF; Rutala WA
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(10):1274-7. PubMed ID: 12633189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of rings on the efficacy of hand sanitization and residual bacterial contamination.
    Wongworawat MD; Jones SG
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 28(3):351-3. PubMed ID: 17326029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the user acceptability of chlorhexidine handwash formulations.
    Scott D; Barnes A; Lister M; Arkell P
    J Hosp Infect; 1991 Jun; 18 Suppl B():51-5. PubMed ID: 1679448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective, randomized in vivo comparison of a dual-active waterless antiseptic versus two alcohol-only waterless antiseptics for surgical hand antisepsis.
    Olson LK; Morse DJ; Duley C; Savell BK
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Mar; 40(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22381223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of surgical site infections with waterless and traditional hand scrubbing protocols on bacterial growth.
    Chen CF; Han CL; Kan CP; Chen SG; Hung PW
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 May; 40(4):e15-7. PubMed ID: 22305412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of two bactericidal handwashing agents containing chlorhexidine.
    Lee MG; Hunt P; Felix D
    J Hosp Infect; 1988 Jul; 12(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2905375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidine-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment.
    Kampf G; Shaffer M; Hunte C
    BMC Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 5():48. PubMed ID: 15963239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antiseptic Effect of Conventional Povidone-Iodine Scrub, Chlorhexidine Scrub, and Waterless Hand Rub in a Surgical Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Tsai JC; Lin YK; Huang YJ; Loh EW; Wen HY; Wang CH; Tsai YT; Hsieh WS; Tam KW
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 27995837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardized method for evaluation of hand disinfection by surgical scrub formulations.
    Crémieux A; Reverdy ME; Pons JL; Savage C; Chevalier J; Fleurette J; Mossé M
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 55(11):2944-8. PubMed ID: 2696429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in-use evaluation of an alcohol-based pre-surgical hand disinfectant.
    Bryce EA; Spence D; Roberts FJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 22(10):635-9. PubMed ID: 11776350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.