BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19767003)

  • 1. Determining effective subject-specific strength levels for forward dives using computer simulations of recorded performances.
    King MA; Kong PW; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2672-7. PubMed ID: 19767003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal compliant-surface jumping: a multi-segment model of springboard standing jumps.
    Cheng KB; Hubbard M
    J Biomech; 2005 Sep; 38(9):1822-9. PubMed ID: 16023469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hip extension during the come-out of multiple forward and inward pike somersaulting dives is controlled by eccentric contraction of the hip flexors.
    Kong PW
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Mar; 28(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 20373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximising somersault rotation in tumbling.
    King MA; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 14996558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximising forward somersault rotation in springboard diving.
    King MA; Kong PW; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 85():157-163. PubMed ID: 30732909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of arms in somersaulting from compliant surfaces: a simulation study of springboard standing dives.
    Cheng KB; Hubbard M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Feb; 27(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 17920146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a torque-driven model of jumping for height.
    King MA; Wilson C; Yeadon MR
    J Appl Biomech; 2006 Nov; 22(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 17293623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of simulation model complexity on the estimation of internal loading in gymnastics landings.
    Mills C; Pain MT; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):620-8. PubMed ID: 18005975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of subject-specific model parameters for visco-elastic elements.
    Wilson C; King MA; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1883-90. PubMed ID: 16002080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional variability in the takeoff phase of one metre springboard forward dives.
    Sayyah M; King MA; Hiley MJ; Yeadon MR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102634. PubMed ID: 32452387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the mechanics of takeoff in reverse and forward springboard somersaulting dives.
    King MA; Kong PW; Yeadon MR
    Sports Biomech; 2023 Feb; 22(2):255-267. PubMed ID: 35119354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional variability in the flight phase of one metre springboard forward dives.
    Sayyah M; Hiley MJ; King MA; Yeadon MR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():234-243. PubMed ID: 29738942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Considerations that affect optimised simulation in a running jump for height.
    Wilson C; Yeadon MR; King MA
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(14):3155-61. PubMed ID: 17509598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of initial conditions and takeoff technique on running jumps for height and distance.
    Wilson C; King MA; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2011 Aug; 44(12):2207-12. PubMed ID: 21733519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is a single or double arm technique more advantageous in triple jumping?
    Allen SJ; King MA; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2010 Dec; 43(16):3156-61. PubMed ID: 20709319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal jumping strategies from compliant surfaces: a simple model of springboard standing jumps.
    Cheng KB; Hubbard M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2004 Jun; 23(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 15201040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The limits of aerial techniques for producing twist in forward 1½ somersault dives.
    Yeadon MR; Hiley MJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():97-107. PubMed ID: 29408164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing performance in the Hecht vault and implications for modelling.
    King MA; Yeadon MR
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 15519350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a subject-specific female gymnast model and simulation of an uneven parallel bar swing.
    Sheets AL; Hubbard M
    J Biomech; 2008 Nov; 41(15):3139-44. PubMed ID: 18930233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parameter determination for a computer simulation model of a diver and a springboard.
    Yeadon MR; Kong PW; King MA
    J Appl Biomech; 2006 Aug; 22(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 17215548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.