These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19767513)
1. Evaluation of periapical changes following endodontic therapy: digital subtraction technique compared with computerized morphometric analysis. Carvalho FB; Gonçalves M; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru-Filho M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):438-44. PubMed ID: 19767513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: a technical report. Carvalho FB; Gonçalves M; Tanomaru-Filho M J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 17368347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of the bone repair process of chronic apical periodontitis after root canal treatment. Benfica e Silva J; Leles CR; Alencar AH; Nunes CA; Mendonça EF Int Endod J; 2010 Aug; 43(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 20491984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observation of the healing process of periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography. Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 12184420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone-beam computerized tomographic, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of periapical repair in dogs' post-endodontic treatment. de Paula-Silva FW; Santamaria M; Leonardo MR; Consolaro A; da Silva LA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):796-805. PubMed ID: 19734073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image processing for enhanced observer agreement in the evaluation of periapical bone changes. Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Bragger U; Patrikiou A; Stassinakis A; Lang NP Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):615-22. PubMed ID: 12190901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical application prospect of digital subtraction technique for periapical radiographs]. Ma X; Zhang G; Chen H Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 30(6):323-5, 383. PubMed ID: 8762531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction. Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital image processing in endodontics]. Hulsmann M; Jager A; Steinhofel N Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Jul; 45(7):421-4. PubMed ID: 2269139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiological and histopathological evaluation of experimentally-induced periapical lesion in rats. Teixeira RC; Rubira CM; Assis GF; Lauris JR; Cestari TM; Rubira-Bullen IR J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 21922123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes. Razi T; Mohammadi A; Ghojazadeh M J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 22991637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between PAI and quantitative digital radiographic assessment of apical healing after endodontic treatment. Delano EO; Ludlow JB; Ørstavik D; Tyndall D; Trope M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 11458254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Studies on the use of digital radiography for the assessment of periapical bone lesions. Kullendorff B Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 118():1-40. PubMed ID: 8971996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region. Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images. Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosing periapical bone lesions on radiographs by means of texture analysis. Mol A; Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Jun; 73(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 1437047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images. Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]