167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19767514)
1. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries.
Young SM; Lee JT; Hodges RJ; Chang TL; Elashoff DA; White SC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):445-51. PubMed ID: 19767514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
White SC; Yoon DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Detection accuracy of occlusal caries by cone-beam computed tomography images scanned with different parameters].
Han GS; Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 44(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22353904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.
Rathore S; Tyndall D; Wright J; Everett E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 22184471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of limited cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of horizontal root fracture.
Kamburoğlu K; Ilker Cebeci AR; Gröndahl HG
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Jun; 25(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 19583573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurt H; Kolsuz E; Öztaş B; Tatar I; Çelik HH
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 21116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
