These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19767514)

  • 21. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials.
    Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
    Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
    Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should cavitation in proximal surfaces be reported in cone beam computed tomography examination?
    Sansare K; Singh D; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Saxena V; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24481006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
    Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of Pseudocolor Filter in Micro-computed Tomography Images for Detection of Proximal and Occlusal Caries Lesions in Primary Molars.
    Freitas SA; Panzarella FK; Karia RH; Cavaletti MR; Junqueira JLC; Oliveira LB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 31204318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography.
    Hashimoto K; Kawashima S; Kameoka S; Akiyama Y; Honjoya T; Ejima K; Sawada K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 18033942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro.
    Matherne RP; Angelopoulos C; Kulild JC; Tira D
    J Endod; 2008 Jan; 34(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 18155501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
    Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
    Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors.
    Wenzel A; Hirsch E; Christensen J; Matzen LH; Scaf G; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):39458105. PubMed ID: 22842638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Frydenberg M; Kirkevang LL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 19875312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Histological validation of cone-beam computed tomography versus laser fluorescence and conventional diagnostic methods for occlusal caries detection.
    Ozturk E; Sinanoglu A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Feb; 33(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.