These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19767523)

  • 1. Author's reply to the Letter to the Editor entitled "Gold standard for the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic images for approximal caries detection" published in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009;38:245).
    Akarslan ZZ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):493; author reply 494. PubMed ID: 19767523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gold standard for the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic images for approximal caries detection.
    Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 May; 38(4):245. PubMed ID: 19372113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study.
    Jeon KJ; Han SS; Lee C; Choi YJ; Jung HI; Kim YH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(8):20190467. PubMed ID: 32348170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections.
    Schulte AG; Wittchen A; Stachniss V; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries.
    Scarfe WC; Langlais RP; Nummikoski P; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Deahl ST; Yuan CH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 8139839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.
    Hintze H; Wenze A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 9084258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings.
    Verdonschot EH; Wenzel A; Bronkhorst EM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 8222599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.