These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19768681)

  • 1. Regional covariation and its application for predicting protein contact patches.
    Xu Y; Tillier ER
    Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(3):548-58. PubMed ID: 19768681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions.
    Larson SM; Di Nardo AA; Davidson AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 11031119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing phylogenetic bias in correlated mutation analysis.
    Ashkenazy H; Kliger Y
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2010 May; 23(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 20067922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functionally compensating coevolving positions are neither homoplasic nor conserved in clades.
    Gloor GB; Tyagi G; Abrassart DM; Kingston AJ; Fernandes AD; Dunn SD; Brandl CJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):1181-91. PubMed ID: 20065119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contributions of residue pairing to beta-sheet formation: conservation and covariation of amino acid residue pairs on antiparallel beta-strands.
    Mandel-Gutfreund Y; Zaremba SM; Gregoret LM
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 305(5):1145-59. PubMed ID: 11162120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins.
    Martin LC; Gloor GB; Dunn SD; Wahl LM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4116-24. PubMed ID: 16159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families.
    Lichtarge O; Bourne HR; Cohen FE
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Mar; 257(2):342-58. PubMed ID: 8609628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structural and functional characterization of binding sites in metallocarboxypeptidases based on Optimal Docking Area analysis.
    Fernández D; Vendrell J; Avilés FX; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 17407161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlated mutation analyses on very large sequence families.
    Oliveira L; Paiva AC; Vriend G
    Chembiochem; 2002 Oct; 3(10):1010-7. PubMed ID: 12362367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins.
    Madabushi S; Yao H; Marsh M; Kristensen DM; Philippi A; Sowa ME; Lichtarge O
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Feb; 316(1):139-54. PubMed ID: 11829509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions.
    Gloor GB; Martin LC; Wahl LM; Dunn SD
    Biochemistry; 2005 May; 44(19):7156-65. PubMed ID: 15882054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of conserved protein complexes based on a model of protein network evolution.
    Hirsh E; Sharan R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e170-6. PubMed ID: 17237088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Codep: maximizing co-evolutionary interdependencies to discover interacting proteins.
    Tillier ER; Biro L; Li G; Tillo D
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):822-31. PubMed ID: 16634043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information.
    Armon A; Graur D; Ben-Tal N
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(1):447-63. PubMed ID: 11243830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting functional sites with an automated algorithm suitable for heterogeneous datasets.
    La D; Livesay DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():116. PubMed ID: 15890082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface map comparison: studying function diversity of homologous proteins.
    Pawlowski K; Godzik A
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Jun; 309(3):793-806. PubMed ID: 11397097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation.
    Capra JA; Singh M
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(15):1875-82. PubMed ID: 17519246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The many faces of protein-protein interactions: A compendium of interface geometry.
    Kim WK; Henschel A; Winter C; Schroeder M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Sep; 2(9):e124. PubMed ID: 17009862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the accuracy of inferring energetic coupling between distant sites in protein families from evolutionary imprints: illustrations using lattice model.
    Liu Z; Chen J; Thirumalai D
    Proteins; 2009 Dec; 77(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 19639636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.