These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Reliable and robust detection of coevolving protein residues. Jeong CS; Kim D Protein Eng Des Sel; 2012 Nov; 25(11):705-13. PubMed ID: 23077274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Codon-level information improves predictions of inter-residue contacts in proteins by correlated mutation analysis. Jacob E; Unger R; Horovitz A Elife; 2015 Sep; 4():e08932. PubMed ID: 26371555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative analysis of sequence covariation methods to mine evolutionary hubs: examples from selected GPCR families. Pelé J; Moreau M; Abdi H; Rodien P; Castel H; Chabbert M Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2141-56. PubMed ID: 24677372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of multiple-sequence-alignment depth on Potts statistical models of protein covariation. Haldane A; Levy RM Phys Rev E; 2019 Mar; 99(3-1):032405. PubMed ID: 30999494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Reducing the false positive rate in the non-parametric analysis of molecular coevolution. Codoñer FM; O'Dea S; Fares MA BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Apr; 8():106. PubMed ID: 18402697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Phylogenetic and Other Conservation-Based Approaches to Predict Protein Functional Sites. Atas H; Tuncbag N; Doğan T Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():51-69. PubMed ID: 29594767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Accurate simulation and detection of coevolution signals in multiple sequence alignments. Ackerman SH; Tillier ER; Gatti DL PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47108. PubMed ID: 23091608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multidimensional mutual information methods for the analysis of covariation in multiple sequence alignments. Clark GW; Ackerman SH; Tillier ER; Gatti DL BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 May; 15():157. PubMed ID: 24886131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Covariation Is a Poor Measure of Molecular Coevolution. Talavera D; Lovell SC; Whelan S Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Sep; 32(9):2456-68. PubMed ID: 25944916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evolutionary constraint networks in ligand-binding domains: an information-theoretic approach. Nagl SB; Freeman J; Smith TF Pac Symp Biocomput; 1999; ():90-101. PubMed ID: 10380188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Protein engineering and stabilization from sequence statistics: variation and covariation analysis. Durani V; Magliery TJ Methods Enzymol; 2013; 523():237-56. PubMed ID: 23422433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Using analyses of amino Acid coevolution to understand protein structure and function. Ashenberg O; Laub MT Methods Enzymol; 2013; 523():191-212. PubMed ID: 23422431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. How is structural divergence related to evolutionary information? Zea DJ; Monzon AM; Parisi G; Marino-Buslje C Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 Oct; 127():859-866. PubMed ID: 29953938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of a novel method for the identification of coevolving protein residues. Pritchard L; Bladon P; M O Mitchell J; J Dufton M Protein Eng; 2001 Aug; 14(8):549-55. PubMed ID: 11579223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues. Rumpf RW; Ray WC J Vis Exp; 2015 Jul; (101):e52878. PubMed ID: 26274377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Olmea O; Valencia A Fold Des; 1997; 2(3):S25-32. PubMed ID: 9218963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]