127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19769516)
1. Biomechanics of C-7 transfacet screw fixation.
Horn EM; Reyes PM; Baek S; Senoglu M; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Sep; 11(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 19769516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
Traynelis VC; Sherman J; Nottmeier E; Singh V; McGilvray K; Puttlitz CM; Leahy PD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions.
Agarwala A; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling.
Ferrara LA; Secor JL; Jin BH; Wakefield A; Inceoglu S; Benzel EC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1226-34. PubMed ID: 12811265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.
Härtl R; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; Chou D; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Oct; 5(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 17048771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
Xu R; McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 21121745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar low-profile locking screw-plate construct versus a standard top-loading cantilevered pedicle screw-rod construct: technical report.
Crawford NR; Doğan S; Yüksel KZ; Villasana-Ramos O; Soto-Barraza JC; Sawa AG; Porter RW; Marciano FF; Theodore N
Neurosurgery; 2010 Feb; 66(2):E404-6; discussion E406. PubMed ID: 20087110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thoracic transfacet pedicle screw fixation: a new instrumentation technique.
Akbay A; Inceoğlu S; Milks R; Schlenk R; Palaoglu S; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Sep; 3(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 16235706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
