These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19769699)

  • 1. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.
    Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies].
    Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterogeneity assessment in gastroenterology systematic reviews: an analysis of current practices.
    Heavener T; Richards J; Bird H; Vassar M
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 29176428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.
    Higgins J; Thompson S; Deeks J; Altman D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jan; 7(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 11822262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis: when and how.
    Imperiale TF
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.
    Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 8030632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research.
    McInnes MD; Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26402491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding and Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Mittal N; Goyal M; Mittal PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 28872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of heterogeneity in a systematic review using meta-regression technique.
    Lo K; Stephenson M; Lockwood C
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2019 Jun; 17(2):131-142. PubMed ID: 30870267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.