327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19770607)
21. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Passive cervical spine flexion: the effect of age and gender.
Seacrist T; Saffioti J; Balasubramanian S; Kadlowec J; Sterner R; García-España JF; Arbogast KB; Maltese MR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 22133530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children.
Lynch-Caris T; Majeske KD; Brelin-Fornari J; Nashi S
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 18675420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: a comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer.
Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU
Man Ther; 2008 Oct; 13(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 17681865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacer.
Kubo S; Goel VK; Yang SJ; Tajima N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 12567022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How do spinal segments move?
Wachowski MM; Mansour M; Lee C; Ackenhausen A; Spiering S; Fanghänel J; Dumont C; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2286-93. PubMed ID: 19682692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Video based measurement of sagittal range of spinal motion in young and older adults.
Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
Man Ther; 2009 Dec; 14(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19201248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical motion segment contributions to head motion during flexion\extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2538-43. PubMed ID: 26334229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantifying the effect of age on passive range of motion of the cervical spine in healthy working-age women.
Salo PK; Häkkinen AH; Kautiainen H; Ylinen JJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Jun; 39(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 19487821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Kinetics of the cervical spine in pediatric and adult volunteers during low speed frontal impacts.
Seacrist T; Arbogast KB; Maltese MR; García-Espaňa JF; Lopez-Valdes FJ; Kent RW; Tanji H; Higuchi K; Balasubramanian S
J Biomech; 2012 Jan; 45(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 22056197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Moment arms of the human neck muscles in flexion, bending and rotation.
Ackland DC; Merritt JS; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 21074159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Head-trunk kinematics during high-velocity-low-amplitude manipulation of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: helical axis computation and anatomic motion modeling.
Dugailly PM; Sobczak S; Van Geyt B; Bonnechère B; Maroye L; Moiseev F; Rooze M; Salvia P; Feipel V
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015; 38(6):416-24. PubMed ID: 26215899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
Ivancic PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation.
Salem W; Lenders C; Mathieu J; Hermanus N; Klein P
Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23375147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Kinematic motion patterns of the cranial and caudal canine cervical spine.
Johnson JA; da Costa RC; Bhattacharya S; Goel V; Allen MJ
Vet Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(6):720-7. PubMed ID: 21770978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
