These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19770609)

  • 1. Empirical evidence of an association between internal validity and effect size in randomized controlled trials of low-back pain.
    van Tulder MW; Suttorp M; Morton S; Bouter LM; Shekelle P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1685-92. PubMed ID: 19770609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomized controlled trials: the Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example.
    Malmivaara A; Koes BW; Bouter LM; van Tulder MW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1405-9. PubMed ID: 16741446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain.
    Koes BW; Malmivaara A; van Tulder MW
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 15949774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality and homogeneity influenced agreement between randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of the same intervention for back pain.
    Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):209-31. PubMed ID: 18226744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: comparing results of randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions for low back pain.
    Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 18303468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The risk of bias and sample size of trials of spinal manipulative therapy for low back and neck pain: analysis and recommendations.
    Rubinstein SM; van Eekelen R; Oosterhuis T; de Boer MR; Ostelo RW; van Tulder MW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Oct; 37(8):523-41. PubMed ID: 25194968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for pediatric procedural pain: recommendations for quality improvement.
    Uman LS; Chambers CT; McGrath PJ; Kisely S; Matthews D; Hayton K
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2010 Aug; 35(7):693-703. PubMed ID: 19966314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials.
    Macedo LG; Elkins MR; Maher CG; Moseley AM; Herbert RD; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):920-5. PubMed ID: 20171839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics for acute bronchitis: a critical review of the literature.
    Orr PH; Scherer K; Macdonald A; Moffatt ME
    J Fam Pract; 1993 May; 36(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 8482934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting outcomes of back pain trials: a modified Delphi study.
    Froud R; Eldridge S; Kovacs F; Breen A; Bolton J; Dunn K; Fritz J; Keller A; Kent P; Lauridsen HH; Ostelo R; Pincus T; van Tulder M; Vogel S; Underwood M
    Eur J Pain; 2011 Nov; 15(10):1068-74. PubMed ID: 21596600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do workplace interventions prevent low-back disorders? If so, why?: a methodologic commentary.
    Volinn E
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):258-72. PubMed ID: 9973883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing methodological quality of randomized and quasi-experimental trials: a summary of stuttering treatment research.
    Nye C; Hahs-Vaughn D
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Feb; 13(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 21329411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain.
    Ferreira ML; Herbert RD; Ferreira PH; Latimer J; Ostelo RW; Nascimento DP; Smeets RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 22014888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.
    Kocsis JH; Gerber AJ; Milrod B; Roose SP; Barber J; Thase ME; Perkins P; Leon AC
    Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 20399343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting of Rehabilitation Intervention for Low Back Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials: Is the Treatment Fully Replicable?
    Gianola S; Castellini G; Agostini M; Bolotta R; Corbetta D; Frigerio P; Gasparini M; Gozzer P; Guariento E; Li LC; Pecoraro V; Sirtori V; Turolla A; Andreano A; Moja L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Mar; 41(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 26926164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: development of an interventional pain management specific instrument.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Cohen SP; Heavner JE; Falco FJ; Diwan S; Boswell MV; Candido KD; Onyewu CO; Zhu J; Sehgal N; Kaye AD; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Singh V; Datta S; Abdi S; Christo PJ; Hameed H; Hameed M; Vallejo R; Pampati V; Racz GB; Raj PP
    Pain Physician; 2014; 17(3):E263-90. PubMed ID: 24850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.
    Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials.
    Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.
    Froud R; Bjørkli T; Bright P; Rajendran D; Buchbinder R; Underwood M; Evans D; Eldridge S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():370. PubMed ID: 26620449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions.
    van Tulder MW; Koes BW; Bouter LM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep; 22(18):2128-56. PubMed ID: 9322325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.