242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19770618)
1. Re: Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Bartels RH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1740. PubMed ID: 19770618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Heller JG; Sasso RC; Papadopoulos SM; Anderson PA; Fessler RG; Hacker RJ; Coric D; Cauthen JC; Riew DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 19112337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical arthroplasty.
Danish SF; Marcotte PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Sep; 7(3):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 17877278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.
Grob D; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Lattig F; Jeszenszky D; Luca A; Mutter U; Mannion AF
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19882177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Xu JX; Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Ding WY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 19404176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Mummaneni PV; Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Zdeblick TA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 17355018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical disc replacement C5-6.
Bonkowski J; Avadhani A; Manu A; Rajasekaran S
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):345-6. PubMed ID: 20130928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques?
Barbagallo GM; Assietti R; Corbino L; Olindo G; Foti PV; Russo V; Albanese V
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19415346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjacent-level cervical ossification after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Garrido BJ; Wilhite J; Nakano M; Crawford C; Baldus C; Riew KD; Sasso RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1185-9. PubMed ID: 21776570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique.
Buchowski JM; Anderson PA; Sekhon L; Riew KD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 91 Suppl 2():223-32. PubMed ID: 19805586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of bioresorbable and titanium plates in cervical spinal fusion: early radiologic and clinical results.
Nabhan A; Ishak B; Steimer O; Zimmer A; Pitzen T; Steudel WI; Pape D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 19412016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PEEK cage cervical ventral fusion in spondylodiscitis.
Mondorf Y; Gaab MR; Oertel JM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 Nov; 151(11):1537-41. PubMed ID: 19756355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.
Yoon DH; Yi S; Shin HC; Kim KN; Kim SH
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Sep; 148(9):943-50. PubMed ID: 16791434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Versus Cervical Disk Arthroplasty.
Elliott IS; Spiker WR; Caputo AM; Darden BV
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):309-12. PubMed ID: 26466338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.
Cavanaugh DA; Nunley PD; Kerr EJ; Werner DJ; Jawahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):E262-5. PubMed ID: 19333091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior decompression via a wide transvertebral approach and a ceramic insert in a patient with cervical degenerative disease.
Kim K; Isu T; Sugawara A; Matsumoto R; Isobe M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Feb; 67(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 17254864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical laminoplasty.
Luk KD; Kamath V; Avadhani A; Rajasekaran S
Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):347-8. PubMed ID: 20130926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
