These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19773583)

  • 21. Reorganizing the system of care surrounding laparoscopic surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis using discrete-event simulation.
    Stahl JE; Rattner D; Wiklund R; Lester J; Beinfeld M; Gazelle GS
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 15358995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Process improvement in hospitals: a case study in a radiology department.
    Nickel S; Schmidt UA
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2009; 18(4):326-38. PubMed ID: 19851240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Designed to fail: how computer simulation can detect fundamental flaws in clinic flow.
    Parks JK; Engblom P; Hamrock E; Satjapot S; Levin S
    J Healthc Manag; 2011; 56(2):135-44; discussion 145-6. PubMed ID: 21495531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulation-based evaluation of operating room management policies.
    Schoenfelder J; Kohl S; Glaser M; McRae S; Brunner JO; Koperna T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Mar; 21(1):271. PubMed ID: 33761931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Typical savings from each minute reduction in tardy first case of the day starts.
    Dexter F; Epstein RH
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1262-7. PubMed ID: 19299798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.
    Vijan S; Inadomi J; Hayward RA; Hofer TP; Fendrick AM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Sep; 20(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 15339322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity patient-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.
    Shankaran V; McKoy JM; Dandade N; Nonzee N; Tigue CA; Bennett CL; Denberg TD
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(33):5248-53. PubMed ID: 18024871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resource reallocation in an emergency medical service system using computer simulation.
    Su S; Shih CL
    Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Nov; 20(7):627-34. PubMed ID: 12442243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
    Sanchez W; Harewood GC; Petersen BT
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1941-5. PubMed ID: 15447753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Bauerfeind P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Aug; 94(8):2268-74. PubMed ID: 10445561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system.
    Kazarian ES; Carreira FS; Toribara NW; Denberg TD
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Apr; 6(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 18304886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost effectiveness of colonoscopy, based on the appropriateness of an indication.
    Hassan C; Di Giulio E; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Laghi A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1231-6. PubMed ID: 18995214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reducing room turnaround time at a regional hospital.
    Brown EC; Kros J
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 20042938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Capacity constraints and cost-effectiveness: a discrete event simulation for drug-eluting stents.
    Jahn B; Pfeiffer KP; Theurl E; Tarride JE; Goeree R
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 19789389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.
    Krist AH; Jones RM; Woolf SH; Woessner SE; Merenstein D; Kerns JW; Foliaco W; Jackson P
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Dec; 33(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 18022063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.
    Ko CW; Sonnenberg A
    Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 16230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hospital health care resource utilization and costs of colorectal cancer during the first 3-year period following diagnosis in Switzerland.
    Delcò F; Egger R; Bauerfeind P; Beglinger C
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Mar; 21(5):615-22. PubMed ID: 15740546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of hourly block appointments with sequential patient scheduling in a dermatology practice.
    Penneys NS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Nov; 43(5 Pt 1):809-13. PubMed ID: 11050585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening.
    Gay G; Delvaux M; Frederic M; Fassler I
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 105(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 19888198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-throughput operating room system for joint arthroplasties durably outperforms routine processes.
    Smith MP; Sandberg WS; Foss J; Massoli K; Kanda M; Barsoum W; Schubert A
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 18580169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.