BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19773659)

  • 1. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Gygi B; Ho KT
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101. PubMed ID: 22891070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1126-39. PubMed ID: 18247913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S; Green T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL336-42. PubMed ID: 23039574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.
    Drouin JR; Theodore RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):981. PubMed ID: 36050170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
    Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.
    Loebach JL; Bent T; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):552-61. PubMed ID: 18646998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.