These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19774768)

  • 1. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire with a maximum-security psychiatric population.
    Villeneuve DB; Oliver N; Loza W
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1325-34. PubMed ID: 19774768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): an offender risk and need assessment measure on Australian, British, Canadian, Singaporean, and American offenders.
    Loza W; Cumbleton A; Shahinfar A; Neo LH; Evans M; Conley M; Summers R
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1172-90. PubMed ID: 15358941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16598660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invalidity of "disconfirmation of the predictive validity of the self-appraisal questionnaire in a sample of high-risk drug offenders" (2006): a reply.
    Dhaliwal GK; Loza W; Reddon JR
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1077-89. PubMed ID: 17709811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The myth of offenders' deception on self-report measure predicting recidivism: example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ).
    Loza W; Loza-Fanous A; Heseltine K
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jun; 22(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 17515429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes of Chinese community members and psychiatrists towards forensic psychiatric assessments.
    Shaoling Z; Jun W; Graham M; Chen C; Simei Z; Qiguang L; Qun W; Jiansong Z; Xiaoping W
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Dec; 258():283-288. PubMed ID: 28867405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-validation of the self-appraisal questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders.
    Loza W; Neo LH; Shahinfar A; Loza-Fanous A
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Oct; 49(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 16260482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and Validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool-II.
    Epperson DL; Ralston CA
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Dec; 27(6):529-58. PubMed ID: 24492618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the "Security Needs Assessment Profile" for measuring the profiles of security needs of Chinese forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Siu BWM; Au-Yeung CCY; Chan AWL; Chan LSY; Yuen KK; Leung HW; Yan CK; Ng KK; Lai ACH; Davies S; Collins M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():61-66. PubMed ID: 28528124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of sex offenders treatment program on cognitive and emotional characteristics of mentally ill sex offenders.
    Kim JH; Choi SS; Rhee MS; Kim SB; Joung JS; Kim EH
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1608-13. PubMed ID: 22804231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders.
    Fazel S; Sjöstedt G; Långström N; Grann M
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16633906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The offence process of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.
    Courtney J; Rose J; Mason O
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):169-91. PubMed ID: 16944326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age and sexual recidivism: a variable connection.
    Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 16639535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reanalysis of the self-appraisal questionnaire: psychometric properties and predictive validity.
    Mitchell O; Caudy MS; MacKenzie DL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Apr; 57(4):445-59. PubMed ID: 22297774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders.
    Loza W; Conley M; Warren B
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Feb; 48(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 14969119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program.
    Olver ME; Wong SC; Nicholaichuk TP
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Mar; 24(3):522-36. PubMed ID: 18458350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.