These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19774824)

  • 1. Negative pressure suction technique for bone cement introduction into the delivery syringe. A technical note.
    Leijssen P; Thienpont E
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Aug; 75(4):543-5. PubMed ID: 19774824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined syringe cement pressurisation and intra-osseous suction: an effective technique in total knee arthroplasty.
    Matthews JJ; Ball L; Blake SM; Cox PJ
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Oct; 75(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 19999876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 systems.
    Munro NA; Nicol M; Selvaraj S; Hussain SM; Finlayson DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 17826282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cement delivery depends on cement gun performance and cement viscosity].
    Heisel C; Schelling K; Thomsen M; Schneider U; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12605338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing.
    Beckmann J; Goldapp C; Ringleff K; Schaumburger J; Grifka J; Perlick L
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1317-25. PubMed ID: 18802712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in revision arthroplasty of the hip.
    Gross AE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jan; 36(1):49-54, vi. PubMed ID: 15542122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bone cement viscosity and set time on mantle area in total knee arthroplasty.
    Kopec M; Milbrandt JC; Kohut N; Kern B; Allan DG
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Oct; 38(10):519-22. PubMed ID: 20011741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of initial pressurization and cup introduction time on the depth of cement penetration in an acetabular model.
    Abdulghani S; Wang JS; McCarthy I; Flivik G
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 17611845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.
    Refsum AM; Nguyen UV; Gjertsen JE; Espehaug B; Fenstad AM; Lein RK; Ellison P; Høl PJ; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Dec; 90(6):582-589. PubMed ID: 31452416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage].
    Wirtz D; Sellei RM; Portheine F; Prescher A; Weber M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 11605292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation system for removal of distal femoral bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama H; Kawanabe K; Goto K; Ohnishi E; Nakamura T
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 17400101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement.
    Parvizi J; Saleh KJ; Ragland PS; Pour AE; Mont MA
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Jun; 79(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 18622836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does increased cement pressure produce superior femoral component fixation?
    Dozier JK; Harrigan T; Kurtz WH; Hawkins C; Hill R
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 10884210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The third-generation modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty].
    Humez M; Fröschen FS; Wirtz DC; Kühn KD
    Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2023 Dec; 52(12):968-980. PubMed ID: 37828239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antibiotic bone cements: their use in routine primary total joint arthroplasty is justified.
    Dunbar MJ
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrusion Characteristics of High Viscosity Bone Cements for the Tibial Component of a Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Negative Pressure Intrusion Cementing Technique.
    Dinh NL; Chong AC; Walden JK; Adrian SC; Cusick RP
    Iowa Orthop J; 2016; 36():161-6. PubMed ID: 27528854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementation of polyethylene liners into well-fixed metal shells at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Mauerhan DR; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Marshall A
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 18534544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental investigation of negative pressure intrusion techniques of acetabular cementation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Niocaill RF; Guerin S; Bitton JR; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Kenny P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2008 Feb; 74(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 18411604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.