These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19774992)

  • 1. [Efficiency and mechanism on reduction of U(VI) by sulfate reducing bacteria].
    Xie SB; Wang SY; Zhang HJ; Liu YJ; Wang JS
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1962-7. PubMed ID: 19774992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Luo J; Weber FA; Cirpka OA; Wu WM; Nyman JL; Carley J; Jardine PM; Criddle CS; Kitanidis PK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):129-48. PubMed ID: 17291626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can microbially-generated hydrogen sulfide account for the rates of U(VI) reduction by a sulfate-reducing bacterium?
    Boonchayaanant B; Gu B; Wang W; Ortiz ME; Criddle CS
    Biodegradation; 2010 Feb; 21(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 19597947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Treating Cr(VI)-containing wastewater by a consortium of sulfate reducing bacteria and copper-iron bimetallic particles].
    He QZ; Chen H; Wang D; Li H; Ding XH; Deng L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Jul; 32(7):2000-5. PubMed ID: 21922821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioreduction of U(VI) and stability of immobilized uranium under suboxic conditions.
    Hu N; Ding DX; Li SM; Tan X; Li GY; Wang YD; Xu F
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Apr; 154():60-7. PubMed ID: 26854555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anaerobic bioremediation of hexavalent uranium in groundwater by reductive precipitation with methanogenic granular sludge.
    Tapia-Rodriguez A; Luna-Velasco A; Field JA; Sierra-Alvarez R
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2153-62. PubMed ID: 20060558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological and chemical interactions with U(VI) during anaerobic enrichment in the presence of iron oxide coated quartz.
    Lee BD; Walton MR; Megio JL
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4363-74. PubMed ID: 16236343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple mechanisms of uranium immobilization by Cellulomonas sp. strain ES6.
    Sivaswamy V; Boyanov MI; Peyton BM; Viamajala S; Gerlach R; Apel WA; Sani RK; Dohnalkova A; Kemner KM; Borch T
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):264-76. PubMed ID: 20872821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction remediation of hexavalent chromium by bacterial flora in Cr(VI) aqueous solution.
    Wang Q; Xu X; Zhao F; Liu Z; Xu J
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(11):2889-96. PubMed ID: 20489262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction of Cr, Mo, Se and U by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans immobilized in polyacrylamide gels.
    Tucker MD; Barton LL; Thomson BM
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 1998 Jan; 20(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 9565467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolation and characterization of a Cr(VI)-reduction Ochrobactrum sp. strain CSCr-3 from chromium landfill.
    He Z; Gao F; Sha T; Hu Y; He C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Apr; 163(2-3):869-73. PubMed ID: 18722054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The treatment of textile wastewater including chromium(VI) and reactive dye by sulfate-reducing bacterial enrichment.
    Cetin D; Dönmez S; Dönmez G
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 17363134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of bacterial U(VI) reduction by calcium.
    Brooks SC; Fredrickson JK; Carroll SL; Kennedy DW; Zachara JM; Plymale AE; Kelly SD; Kemner KM; Fendorf S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(9):1850-8. PubMed ID: 12775057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In situ mobility of uranium in the presence of nitrate following sulfate-reducing conditions.
    Paradis CJ; Jagadamma S; Watson DB; McKay LD; Hazen TC; Park M; Istok JD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Apr; 187():55-64. PubMed ID: 26897652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual and numerical model of uranium(VI) reductive immobilization in fractured subsurface sediments.
    Roden EE; Scheibe TD
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(5):617-28. PubMed ID: 15792659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biochemistry, physiology and biotechnology of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Barton LL; Fauque GD
    Adv Appl Microbiol; 2009; 68():41-98. PubMed ID: 19426853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbial sulfate reduction under sequentially acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic packed bed bioreactor.
    Jong T; Parry DL
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(13):2561-71. PubMed ID: 16814360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamic role of pH in microbial reduction of uranium(VI) in the presence of bicarbonate.
    Xie J; Wang J; Lin J; Zhou X
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt A):659-666. PubMed ID: 30025339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uranium(VI) reduction by iron(II) monosulfide mackinawite.
    Hyun SP; Davis JA; Sun K; Hayes KF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3369-76. PubMed ID: 22316012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.