BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19775047)

  • 1. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
    Lee AK; Tey JB; Lim Y; Sia AT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep; 37(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 19775047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway(SLMA), single use, with the reusable Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway(PLMA) in anesthetized adult Japanese patients].
    Hayashi K; Suzuki A; Kasai T; Kunisawa T; Takahata O; Iwasaki H
    Masui; 2012 Oct; 61(10):1048-52. PubMed ID: 23157084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Brimacombe L
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Sep; 95(3):770-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12198070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube Suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
    Roth H; Genzwuerker HV; Rothhaas A; Finteis T; Schmeck J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Feb; 22(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 15816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery.
    Natalini G; Lanza G; Rosano A; Dell'Agnolo P; Bernardini A
    J Clin Anesth; 2003 Sep; 15(6):428-32. PubMed ID: 14652119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.
    Qamarul Hoda M; Samad K; Ullah H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD009026. PubMed ID: 28727896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
    Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
    Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.
    Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Teoh WH; Lee KM; Suhitharan T; Yahaya Z; Teo MM; Sia AT
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Dec; 65(12):1173-9. PubMed ID: 20958278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Gaitini LA; Vaida SJ; Somri M; Yanovski B; Ben-David B; Hagberg CA
    Anesthesiology; 2004 Aug; 101(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 15277913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients.
    Natalini G; Franceschetti ME; Pantelidi MT; Rosano A; Lanza G; Bernardini A
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Mar; 90(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 12594145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.
    Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.