162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19775853)
1. Restoration of the center of rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kim DH; Cho SH; Jeong ST; Park HB; Hwang SC; Park JS
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1041-6. PubMed ID: 19775853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intermediate-term radiographic and patient outcomes in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular calcar design and porous plasma coating.
Amanatullah DF; Meehan JP; Cullen AB; Kim SH; Jamali AA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1451-4. PubMed ID: 21497483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty.
Zhang H; Zhou J; Liu Y; Guan J; Ding H; Wang Z; Dong Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Apr; 15(1):152. PubMed ID: 32299463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Utilization of Metal Augments Allows Better Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Hip in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Severe Acetabular Defects: A Comparative Study.
Zhou B; Zhou Y; Yang D; Tang H; Shao H; Huang Y
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3724-3733. PubMed ID: 30243881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical-radiological evaluation of the impaction allografting and cemented rod technique in revision knee surgery].
Mateo-Negreira J; López-Cuello P; Pipa-Muñiz I; Rodríguez García N; Murcia-Mazón A; Suárez-Suárez MA
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2016; 60(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 26655209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of structural bone graft with cementless acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty.
Dewal H; Chen F; Su E; Di Cesare PE
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Jan; 18(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12555178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cemented hip revision surgery in severe acetabular defects using a semirigid acetabular reinforcement ring--a 5- to 25-year follow-up study.
Haverkamp D; De Man FH; Slegt R; Besselaar PP; Marti RK
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 18834699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision total hip arthroplasty with cementing technique--five-year results.
Kinov P; Bukarev D; Dimov V; Kazakov K; Tivchev P
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2007; 72(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 18078285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing.
Park YS; Park SJ; Lim SJ
Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):796. PubMed ID: 21053885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early results of total hip replacement with the Metasul metal-on-metal cementless prosthesis.
Vigler M; Greental A; Kaminsky AJ; Shauer L; Salai M; Soudry M
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20345355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Extra-large uncemented acetabular components for hip revision].
Huang Z; Zhang W; Lin J; Li W; Bai G; Shen R
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(11):1313-7. PubMed ID: 24501889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-operative hip centre restoration and migration after impaction bone grafting in revision and complex primary hip arthroplasty.
Abdelnasser MK; Khalifa AA; Mahran MA; Mosa M; Bakr HM; Khalifa YE; Abdelaal AM
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Oct; 29(7):1411-1417. PubMed ID: 31161240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting with cemented nonpolished stems and charnley cups.
Boldt JG; Dilawari P; Agarwal S; Drabu KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):943-52. PubMed ID: 11740747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular cup revision with the use of the medial protrusio technique at an average follow-up of 6.6 years.
Fabi D; Gonzalez M; Goldstein W; Ahmed M
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 19442483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
