BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19776002)

  • 1. CTV to PTV margins for prostate irradiation. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of interfraction uncertainties using portal imaging and serial CT scans.
    Pérez-Romasanta LA; Lozano-Martín E; Velasco-Jiménez J; Mendicote-León F; Sanz-Martín M; Torres-Donaire J; Carrascosa-Fernández C; Zapata-Jimínez JC; Arjona-Gutiérrez J; Gil-Agudo A
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2009 Sep; 11(9):615-21. PubMed ID: 19776002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of margins in pelvic lymph nodes and prostate radiotherapy and the impact of bladder and rectum on prostate position.
    Marnouche EA; Hadadi K; Abdelhak M; Benlemlih M; Hommadi M; Zaghba N; Andaloussi Saghir K; Elmarjany M; Sifat H; Mansouri H
    Cancer Radiother; 2021 Apr; 25(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 33454191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of inter- and intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins. Different alignment techniques in 3D conformal prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Langsenlehner T; Döller C; Winkler P; Gallé G; Kapp KS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 23443612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical evaluation of the planning target volume for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
    Tinger A; Michalski JM; Cheng A; Low DA; Zhu R; Bosch WR; Purdy JA; Perez CA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Aug; 42(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9747840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy.
    Zelefsky MJ; Crean D; Mageras GS; Lyass O; Happersett L; Ling CC; Leibel SA; Fuks Z; Bull S; Kooy HM; van Herk M; Kutcher GJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Feb; 50(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 10368047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of geometrical uncertainties on localized prostate radiotherapy of patients with bilateral metallic hip prostheses using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT: A planning study.
    Soda R; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Shimbo M; Yamano T; Nishimura K; Kondo S; Utsumi N; Takahashi T
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):243-254. PubMed ID: 31985486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate.
    Alasti H; Petric MP; Catton CN; Warde PR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):869-84. PubMed ID: 11172971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
    Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer.
    Yan D; Lockman D; Brabbins D; Tyburski L; Martinez A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Aug; 48(1):289-302. PubMed ID: 10925000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potentials of on-line repositioning based on implanted fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Graf R; Wust P; Budach V; Boehmer D
    Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 4():13. PubMed ID: 19397824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of an online image-guidance strategy for 3D-CRT of prostate cancer.
    Wu Q; Ivaldi G; Liang J; Lockman D; Yan D; Martinez A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Apr; 64(5):1596-609. PubMed ID: 16580509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracking target position variability using intraprostatic fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Munoz F; Fiandra C; Franco P; Guarneri A; Ciammella P; De Stefanis P; Rondi N; Moretto F; Badellino S; Iftode C; Ragona R; Ricardi U
    Radiol Med; 2012 Sep; 117(6):1057-70. PubMed ID: 22327924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planning target margin calculations for prostate radiotherapy based on intrafraction and interfraction motion using four localization methods.
    Beltran C; Herman MG; Davis BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):289-95. PubMed ID: 17919837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.
    Ghilezan M; Yan D; Liang J; Jaffray D; Wong J; Martinez A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1602-10. PubMed ID: 15590192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereotactic IMRT for prostate cancer: setup accuracy of a new stereotactic body localization system.
    Wang L; Jacob R; Chen L; Ma C; Movsas B; Feigenberg S; Konski A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(2):18-28. PubMed ID: 15738910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
    Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainties and CTV to PTV margins quantitative assessment using cone-beam CT technique in clinical application for prostate, and head and neck irradiation tumours.
    Juan-Senabre XJ; López-Tarjuelo J; Conde-Moreno A; Santos-Serra A; Sánchez-Iglesias AL; Quirós-Higueras JD; de Marco Blancas N; Calzada-Feliu S; Ferrer-Albiach C
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Nov; 13(11):819-25. PubMed ID: 22082648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of portal images and BAT ultrasonography to measure setup error and organ motion for prostate IMRT: implications for treatment margins.
    Little DJ; Dong L; Levy LB; Chandra A; Kuban DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Aug; 56(5):1218-24. PubMed ID: 12873664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.