These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19776571)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of laser-induced fluorescence measurements on carious root surfaces in vitro.
    Karlsson L; Johansson E; Tranaeus S
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 19776571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro quantification of smooth surface caries with DIAGNOdent and the DIAGNOdent pen.
    Aljehani A; Yang L; Shi XQ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Feb; 65(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17354096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo validity and reliability of IR fluorescence measurements for caries detection and quantification.
    Tranaeus S; Lindgren LE; Karlsson L; Angmar-Månsson B
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(4):173-82. PubMed ID: 15779494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro ability of a laser fluorescence device in quantifying approximal caries lesions in primary molars.
    Celiberti P; Leamari VM; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    J Dent; 2010 Aug; 38(8):666-70. PubMed ID: 20470856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Bengtson AL; Gomes AC; Mendes FM; Cichello LR; Bengtson NG; Pinheiro SL
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16173230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caries detection and quantification with DIAGNOdent: prospects for occlusal and root caries?
    Haak R; Wicht MJ
    Int J Comput Dent; 2004 Oct; 7(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 16124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two laser fluorescence devices for the detection of occlusal caries in vivo.
    Krause F; Jepsen S; Braun A
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Aug; 115(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 17697163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilization of laser fluorescence to monitor caries lesions development in primary teeth.
    Mendes FM; Nicolau J
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 15587097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions using laser fluorescence measurements].
    Naphausen MT; Riemersma M; Verdonschot EH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Jan; 109(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 11933610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of root caries diagnosis based on visual-tactile criteria and DIAGNOdent in vivo.
    Zhang W; McGrath C; Lo EC
    J Dent; 2009 Jul; 37(7):509-13. PubMed ID: 19406549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of laser fluorescence devices for caries detection through stereomicroscopic imaging.
    Oancea R; Podariu AC; Vasile L; Sava-Roşianu R; Folescu R
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2013; 54(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 23771078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between laser fluorescence readings and volume of tooth preparation in incipient occlusal caries in vitro.
    Ghaname ES; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Vann WF; Shugars DA; Bader JD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Feb; 22(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 20136944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
    Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autoclaving and battery capacity influence on laser fluorescence measurements.
    Rocha-Cabral RM; Mendes FM; Miura F; Ribeiro Ada C; Braga MM; Zezell DM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Apr; 66(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 18446554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra- and interexaminer variability and validity of laser fluorescence and electrical resistance readings on root surface lesions.
    Wicht MJ; Haak R; Stützer H; Strohe D; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 12218272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the condition of the adjacent tooth surface on fluorescence measurements for the detection of approximal caries.
    Lussi A; Zimmerli B; Hellwig E; Jaeggi T
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Dec; 114(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 17184228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between laser fluorescence and enamel hypomineralisation.
    Farah RA; Drummond BK; Swain MV; Williams S
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):915-21. PubMed ID: 18786755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of visual, radiographic, and laser fluorescence methods for detection of occlusal caries.
    Heinrich-Weltzien R; Weerheijm KL; Kühnisch J; Oehme T; Stösser L
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(2):127-32, 123. PubMed ID: 12515052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of DIAGNOdent 2095 and DIAGNOdent Pen measurements: results from an in vitro study on occlusal sites.
    Kühnisch J; Bücher K; Henschel V; Hickel R
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Jun; 115(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 17587296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro.
    Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Diniz MB; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 18663299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.