These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19776665)
21. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context. Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates. Eddins DA; Anand S; Camacho A; Shrivastav R J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):774.e1-774.e7. PubMed ID: 26775221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition. van Dommelen WA Lang Speech; 1990; 33 ( Pt 3)():259-72. PubMed ID: 2093780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S; Lowit A J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions. Schuster S; Degen J Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings. Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. To believe or not to believe? How voice and accent information in speech alter listener impressions of trust. Jiang X; Gossack-Keenan K; Pell MD Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jan; 73(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 31293191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speaker normalization for chinese vowel recognition in cochlear implants. Luo X; Fu QJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1358-61. PubMed ID: 16042003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis. Childers DG; Wu K J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1841-56. PubMed ID: 1755877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the perception of similarity among talkers. Remez RE; Fellowes JM; Nagel DS J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3688-96. PubMed ID: 18247776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children. Monsen RB J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 491555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The speaker's formant. Bele IV J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):555-78. PubMed ID: 16325374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Speaker discrimination performance for "easy" versus "hard" voices in style-matched and -mismatched speech. Afshan A; Kreiman J; Alwan A J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1393. PubMed ID: 35232083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation. Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Training listeners to report the acoustic correlate of formant-frequency scaling using synthetic voices. Barreda S; Nearey TM J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1065-77. PubMed ID: 23363122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization. Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]