These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19777275)

  • 1. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence that consistent auditory cues facilitate learning of spatial relations among locations.
    Sturz BR; Kilday ZA; Bodily KD; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 22289158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.
    Sturz BR; Bodily KD; Katz JS; Kelly DM
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Mar; 12(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18766392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?
    Sturz BR; Diemer SM
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19903512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.
    Sturz BR; Brown MF; Kelly DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 19293099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A consistent but non-coincident visual pattern facilitates the learning of spatial relations among locations.
    Katz SS; Brown MF; Sturz BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 23843178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precedence of spatial pattern learning revealed by immediate reversal performance.
    Brown MF; Sturz BR; Andriole K; Hardesty S; Place M
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(3):252-64. PubMed ID: 20708663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Sturz BR; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 19236148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning associations between places and visual cues without learning to navigate: neither fornix nor entorhinal cortex is required.
    Gaffan EA; Bannerman DM; Healey AN
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 12836914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.
    Biegler R; Morris RG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):307-45. PubMed ID: 8962538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overshadowing between landmarks on the touchscreen and in arena with pigeons.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 21604908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of salient and non-salient visuospatial cues by rats in the Morris Water Maze.
    Young GS; Choleris E; Kirkland JB
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):794-9. PubMed ID: 16516936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Route and landmark learning by rats searching for food.
    Tamara C; Timberlake W
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21044664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blocking of spatial control by landmarks in rats.
    Stahlman WD; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 19429205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
    Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Path information effects in visual and proprioceptive spatial learning.
    Yamamoto N; Shelton AL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 17067542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.