These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19777275)

  • 41. Mental retardation and memory for spatial locations.
    Jones RS; Vaughan FL; Roberts M
    Am J Ment Retard; 2002 Mar; 107(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11853527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Learning of landmark stability and instability by hippocampal place cells.
    Jeffery KJ
    Neuropharmacology; 1998; 37(4-5):677-87. PubMed ID: 9705005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial attention excludes external noise at the target location.
    Lu ZL; Lesmes LA; Dosher BA
    J Vis; 2002; 2(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 12678581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ovals of time: time-space associations in synaesthesia.
    Smilek D; Callejas A; Dixon MJ; Merikle PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):507-19. PubMed ID: 16931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Locomotion, incidental learning, and the selection of spatial reference systems.
    Valiquette CM; McNamara TP; Smith K
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Apr; 31(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 12795489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task.
    Gibson BM; Shettleworth SJ
    Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 12882373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.
    Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Apr; 21(2):166-81. PubMed ID: 7738499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search.
    Endo N; Takeda Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 15129750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues.
    Pellizzer G; Hedges JH
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 150(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 12684730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?
    Gwinn HM; Fernando S; James S; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):713-8. PubMed ID: 12509164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sex differences in landmark learning by children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Kersker JL; Epley ML; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):329-38. PubMed ID: 12705541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens).
    Garrad-Cole F; Lew AR; Bremner JG; Whitaker CJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 115(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 11594501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory.
    Doeller CF; King JA; Burgess N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(15):5915-20. PubMed ID: 18408152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spatial information transfer from virtual to real versions of the Kiel locomotor maze.
    Foreman N; Stirk J; Pohl J; Mandelkow L; Lehnung M; Herzog A; Leplow B
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Jul; 112(1-2):53-61. PubMed ID: 10862935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.
    Spetch ML; Cheng K; MacDonald SE
    J Comp Psychol; 1996 Mar; 110(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 8851553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: the case of depth.
    Moore CM; Elsinger CL; Lleras A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 11436732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of goal-driven attention on the acquisition of location probability learning.
    Holtz EC; Lee VG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):845-857. PubMed ID: 37956040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Landmark enhancement and strategic processing: an evaluation of strategies for spatial navigation training.
    Guest M; Bliss J; Lohmeier J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 1):1123-35. PubMed ID: 9399329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Aurally aided visual search in three-dimensional space.
    Bolia RS; D'Angelo WR; McKinley RL
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):664-9. PubMed ID: 10774135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Learning efficient visual search for stimuli containing diagnostic spatial configurations and color-shape conjunctions.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Tse PU
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1110-1126. PubMed ID: 29651754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.