205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19777373)
1. The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Harrison MJ; Davies LM; Bansback NJ; McCoy MJ; Verstappen SM; Watson K; Symmons DP;
Qual Life Res; 2009 Nov; 18(9):1195-205. PubMed ID: 19777373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand.
Dritsaki M; Petrou S; Williams M; Lamb SE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Jan; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 28118833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative responsiveness of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form 6D to improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor blockers: results of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry.
Buitinga L; Braakman-Jansen LM; Taal E; Kievit W; Visser H; van Riel PL; van de Laar MA
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2012 Jun; 64(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness of EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
Ann Rheum Dis; 2012 Sep; 71(9):1478-83. PubMed ID: 22419775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the validity of estimating EQ-5D and SF-6D utility values from the health assessment questionnaire in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Harrison MJ; Lunt M; Verstappen SM; Watson KD; Bansback NJ; Symmons DP
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Feb; 8():21. PubMed ID: 20149253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Harvie HS; Honeycutt AA; Neuwahl SJ; Barber MD; Richter HE; Visco AG; Sung VW; Shepherd JP; Rogers RG; Jakus-Waldman S; Mazloomdoost D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):265.e1-265.e11. PubMed ID: 30471259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Dutch patients with fractures visiting a Fracture Liaison Service.
Li N; Boonen A; van den Bergh JP; van Kuijk SMJ; Wyers CE; van Oostwaard M; Vranken L; Bours SPG; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):829-839. PubMed ID: 35674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the relationship between the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HAQ and disease activity in inflammatory arthritis.
Adams R; Walsh C; Veale D; Bresnihan B; FitzGerald O; Barry M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):477-87. PubMed ID: 20465316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a difference between EQ-5D and SF-6D in the clinical setting? a comparative study on the quality of life measured by AIMS2-SF, EQ-5D and SF-6D scales for osteoarthritis patients.
Zhang F; Yang Y; Huang T; Zhang Y; Zhao L; Li S
Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(6):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 27463704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of Life and General Health After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Pathologies: Determining a Valid and Responsive Metric of Health State Utility.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Godil SS; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77(4):553-60; discussion 560. PubMed ID: 26191977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of disease severity on EQ-5D and SF-6D utility discrepancies in chronic heart failure.
Kontodimopoulos N; Argiriou M; Theakos N; Niakas D
Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Aug; 12(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 20473544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain.
Ye Z; Sun L; Wang Q
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 30971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.
Obradovic M; Lal A; Liedgens H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Jul; 11():110. PubMed ID: 23815777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of health-related quality of life in individuals with depressive symptoms: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D.
Stolz M; Albus C; Beutel ME; Deter HC; Fritzsche K; Herrmann-Lingen C; Michal M; Petrowski K; Ronel J; Schultz JH; Söllner W; Weber C; de Zwaan M; Krauth C
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Nov; 24(8):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 36385438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.
Wu J; Han Y; Zhao FL; Zhou J; Chen Z; Sun H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Oct; 12():156. PubMed ID: 25343944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jun; 21(4):501-511. PubMed ID: 31902023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EQ-5D-5L is More Responsive than EQ-5D-3L to Treatment Benefit of Cataract Surgery.
Gandhi M; Ang M; Teo K; Wong CW; Wei YC; Tan RL; Janssen MF; Luo N
Patient; 2019 Aug; 12(4):383-392. PubMed ID: 30607809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.
Kanters TA; Redekop WK; Kruijshaar ME; van der Ploeg AT; Rutten-van Mölken MP; Hakkaart L
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 25342117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
