These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19778934)
1. Radiation transport calculations and simulations. Fassò A; Ferrari A; Sala PR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Nov; 137(1-2):118-33. PubMed ID: 19778934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance. Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning. Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods. Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a finite-element multigroup discrete-ordinates code with Monte Carlo for radiotherapy calculations. Gifford KA; Horton JL; Wareing TA; Failla G; Mourtada F Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2253-65. PubMed ID: 16625040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjoint acceleration of Monte Carlo simulations using TORT/MCNP coupling approach: a case study on the shielding improvement for the cyclotron room of the Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital. Sheu RJ; Sheu RD; Jiang SH; Kao CH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 15671054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainties in doses from intakes of radionuclides assessed from monitoring measurements. Etherington G; Birchall A; Puncher M; Molokanov A; Blanchardon E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 17135426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Azimuthal particle redistribution for the reduction of latent phase-space variance in Monte Carlo simulations. Bush K; Zavgorodni SF; Beckham WA Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4345-60. PubMed ID: 17664612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A deterministic partial differential equation model for dose calculation in electron radiotherapy. Duclous R; Dubroca B; Frank M Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3843-57. PubMed ID: 20571208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linking computer-aided design (CAD) to Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulations for precise implementation of complex treatment head geometries. Constantin M; Constantin DE; Keall PJ; Narula A; Svatos M; Perl J Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 55(8):N211-20. PubMed ID: 20348609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficient Monte Carlo simulation of multileaf collimators using geometry-related variance-reduction techniques. Brualla L; Salvat F; Palanco-Zamora R Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4131-49. PubMed ID: 19521002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MCNPX vs. DORT for SNS shielding design studies. Popova II Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):559-63. PubMed ID: 16381785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulations. Earl DJ; Deem MW Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():25-36. PubMed ID: 18446280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainties beyond statistics in Monte Carlo simulations. Hughes HG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):45-51. PubMed ID: 17766264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams. Newhauser W; Koch N; Hummel S; Ziegler M; Titt U Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5229-49. PubMed ID: 16264250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between PENELOPE and electron Monte Carlo simulations of electron fields used in the treatment of conjunctival lymphoma. Brualla L; Palanco-Zamora R; Wittig A; Sempau J; Sauerwein W Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5469-81. PubMed ID: 19706962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo evaluations and the source normalisation problem. Neuhold P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):268-70. PubMed ID: 16381726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics. Rogers DW Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(13):R287-301. PubMed ID: 16790908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different MC techniques to evaluate BNCT dose profiles in phantom exposed tovarious neutron fields. Durisi E; Koivunoro H; Visca L; Borla O; Zanini A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19939825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]