349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19779215)
1. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A global sensitivity analysis of three- and four-layer EEG conductivity models.
Vallaghé S; Clerc M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 19272874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis.
Ferree TC; Eriksen KJ; Tucker DM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Dec; 47(12):1584-92. PubMed ID: 11125593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
