BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

838 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19779985)

  • 1. The revised Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System (APACHE II) is more effective than the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in head-injured patients with systemic trauma.
    Dalgiç A; Ergüngör FM; Becan T; Elhan A; Okay O; Yüksel BC
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 Sep; 15(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 19779985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of APACHE III, II and the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in a neurosurgical intensive care unit.
    Cho DY; Wang YC; Lee MJ
    Clin Intensive Care; 1995; 6(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 10150362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.
    Cho DY; Wang YC
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9037644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the APACHE II, GCS and MRC scores in predicting outcomes in patients with tuberculous meningitis.
    Chou CH; Lin GM; Ku CH; Chang FY
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2010 Jan; 14(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 20003700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.
    Abosaif NY; Tolba YA; Heap M; Russell J; El Nahas AM
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2005 Dec; 46(6):1038-48. PubMed ID: 16310569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score (APACHE) II with GCS in predicting hospital mortality of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.
    Zali AR; Seddighi AS; Seddighi A; Ashrafi F
    Glob J Health Sci; 2012 Apr; 4(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 22980245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of outcomes in trauma: anatomic or physiologic parameters?
    Guzzo JL; Bochicchio GV; Napolitano LM; Malone DL; Meyer W; Scalea TM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 16310692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II.
    Del Bufalo C; Morelli A; Bassein L; Fasano L; Quarta CC; Pacilli AM; Gunella G
    Respir Care; 1995 Oct; 40(10):1042-7. PubMed ID: 10152703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Requirement for hourly Glasgow Coma Scores in the emergency department: process or outcome based?
    Odom SR; Barone JE; Genua JM; Tucker JB; Pisaeno C
    Conn Med; 2003 Feb; 67(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 12664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score Coma Scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale in an emergency setting population.
    Eken C; Kartal M; Bacanli A; Eray O
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 19106717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Head-injured patients who "talk and die": the San Diego perspective.
    Davis DP; Kene M; Vilke GM; Sise MJ; Kennedy F; Eastman AB; Velky T; Hoyt DB
    J Trauma; 2007 Feb; 62(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 17297312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor.
    Healey C; Osler TM; Rogers FB; Healey MA; Glance LG; Kilgo PD; Shackford SR; Meredith JW
    J Trauma; 2003 Apr; 54(4):671-8; discussion 678-80. PubMed ID: 12707528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
    Davis DP; Serrano JA; Vilke GM; Sise MJ; Kennedy F; Eastman AB; Velky T; Hoyt DB
    J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):985-90. PubMed ID: 16688059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.
    Gill M; Windemuth R; Steele R; Green SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Jan; 45(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 15635308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of five simplified scales to the out-of-hospital Glasgow Coma Scale for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.
    Gill M; Steele R; Windemuth R; Green SM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):968-73. PubMed ID: 16894005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing logistic models based on modified GCS motor component with other prognostic tools in prediction of mortality: results of study in 7226 trauma patients.
    Eftekhar B; Zarei MR; Ghodsi M; Moezardalan K; Zargar M; Ketabchi E
    Injury; 2005 Aug; 36(8):900-4. PubMed ID: 15964571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries.
    Demetriades D; Kuncir E; Murray J; Velmahos GC; Rhee P; Chan L
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Aug; 199(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 15275876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early prediction of mortality in isolated head injury patients: a new predictive model.
    Demetriades D; Kuncir E; Brown CV; Martin M; Salim A; Rhee P; Chan LS
    J Trauma; 2006 Oct; 61(4):868-72. PubMed ID: 17033553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale.
    Zhao XX; Su YY; Wang M; Zhang Y; Ye H; Feng HH; Zhang YZ; Gao DQ; Chen WB
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1132-7. PubMed ID: 23506592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect measure modification and confounding of severe head injury mortality by age and multiple organ injury severity.
    Linn S; Levi L; Grunau PD; Zaidise I; Zarka S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 17(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 17236984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.