84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19781026)
1. Biomechanical comparison of four soft tissue replacement materials: an in vitro evaluation of single and multilaminate porcine small intestinal submucosa, canine fascia lata, and polypropylene mesh.
Arnold GA; Mathews KG; Roe S; Mente P; Seaboch T
Vet Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(7):834-44. PubMed ID: 19781026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery.
Dora CD; Dimarco DS; Zobitz ME; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1970-3. PubMed ID: 15076323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tensile strength of cadaveric fascia lata compared to small intestinal submucosa using suture pull through analysis.
Kubricht WS; Williams BJ; Eastham JA; Venable DD
J Urol; 2001 Feb; 165(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 11176402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tissue reactions of 5 sling materials and tissue material detachment strength of 4 synthetic mesh materials in a rabbit model.
Yildirim A; Basok EK; Gulpinar T; Gurbuz C; Zemheri E; Tokuc R
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):2037-40. PubMed ID: 16217389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro biomechanical comparison of polypropylene mesh, modified three-loop pulley suture pattern, and a combination for repair of distal canine achilles' tendon injuries.
Gall TT; Santoni BG; Egger EL; Puttlitz CM; Rooney MB
Vet Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(7):845-51. PubMed ID: 19781027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-dependent variations in inflammation and scar formation of six different pubovaginal sling materials in the rabbit model.
Krambeck AE; Dora CD; Sebo TJ; Rohlinger AL; DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):1105-10. PubMed ID: 16698388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs.
Clarke KM; Lantz GC; Salisbury SK; Badylak SF; Hiles MC; Voytik SL
J Surg Res; 1996 Jan; 60(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 8592400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model.
Konstantinovic ML; Lagae P; Zheng F; Verbeken EK; De Ridder D; Deprest JA
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1554-60. PubMed ID: 16225578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of suture retention strengths for three biomaterials.
Obermiller JF; Hodde JP; McAlexander CS; Kokini K; Badylak SF
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jan; 10(1):PI1-5. PubMed ID: 14704643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue reactions of the rabbit urinary bladder to cadaveric human fascia lata and polypropylene surgical mesh.
Rabah DM; Bégin LR; Zahran A; Corcos J
Can J Urol; 2004 Aug; 11(4):2344-9. PubMed ID: 15380056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Biomechanical research of different polypropylene meshes in breast ptosis correction].
Wang Z; Zeng YJ; Zhang HL; Sun BD; Qiao Q
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 25(6):440-3. PubMed ID: 20209936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model.
Cobb WS; Burns JM; Peindl RD; Carbonell AM; Matthews BD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2006 Nov; 136(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16996087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Elementary evaluation of small intestinal submucosa and polypropylene mesh used for repairing abdominal wall defect in rats].
Zhang X; Luo J; Yang Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 19(7):574-7. PubMed ID: 16108349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for Achilles tendon repair in a dog model.
Badylak SF; Tullius R; Kokini K; Shelbourne KD; Klootwyk T; Voytik SL; Kraine MR; Simmons C
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Aug; 29(8):977-85. PubMed ID: 7593041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical properties of synthetic and biologic graft materials following long-term implantation in the rabbit abdomen and vagina.
Pierce LM; Grunlan MA; Hou Y; Baumann SS; Kuehl TJ; Muir TW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):549.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19285647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo.
Boukerrou M; Boulanger L; Rubod C; Lambaudie E; Dubois P; Cosson M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 17459566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a canine small intestinal submucosal xenograft and polypropylene mesh as bioscaffolds in an abdominal full-thickness resection model of growing rats.
Lee AJ; Lee SH; Chung WH; Kim DH; Chung DJ; Do SH; Kim HY
J Vet Sci; 2013; 14(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 23628657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein's repair of inguinal hernia with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis gold soft tissue graft: preliminary results.
Ansaloni L; Catena F; D'Alessandro L
Acta Biomed; 2003; 74 Suppl 2():10-4. PubMed ID: 15055026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-dependent changes in biomechanical properties of four different synthetic materials in a rabbit model and the importance in respect to sling surgery.
Atmaca AF; Serefoğlu EC; Eroğlu M; Gürdal M; Metin A; Kayigil O
Urol Int; 2008; 81(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 19077410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constructive remodeling of biologic scaffolds is dependent on early exposure to physiologic bladder filling in a canine partial cystectomy model.
Boruch AV; Nieponice A; Qureshi IR; Gilbert TW; Badylak SF
J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 19577253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
