318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19781464)
1. Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses.
Brown D; Dougherty P; Gills JP; Hunkeler J; Sanders DR; Sanders ML
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1711-4. PubMed ID: 19781464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
Claoué C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses.
Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Ortega P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1568-75. PubMed ID: 22906443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.
Alió JL; Ben-nun J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Plaza AB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1671-8. PubMed ID: 19781458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual acuity comparison of 2 models of bifocal aspheric intraocular lenses.
Alfonso JF; Puchades C; Fernández-Vega L; Montés-Micó R; Valcárcel B; Ferrer-Blasco T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):672-6. PubMed ID: 19304087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses.
Leyland MD; Langan L; Goolfee F; Lee N; Bloom PA
Eye (Lond); 2002 Jul; 16(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12101459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants.
Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Davies J; Doane JF; Loden JC; Sivalingham V; Mahmoud AM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 144(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 17651679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: metaanalysis.
Takakura A; Iyer P; Adams JR; Pepin SM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 20202533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Sanders DR; Sanders ML
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1679-84. PubMed ID: 17368545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses.
Findl O; Leydolt C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 17321405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of image quality after implantation of 2 diffractive multifocal intraocular lens models.
Castillo-Gómez A; Carmona-González D; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Palomino-Bautista C; García-Feijoo J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1244-50. PubMed ID: 19545816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
