These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Relating two deep-rooted pedigrees from Central Germany by high-resolution Y-STR haplotyping. Kayser M; Vermeulen M; Knoblauch H; Schuster H; Krawczak M; Roewer L Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 19083742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal peeling order for pedigrees with incomplete genotypic information. Belonogova NM; Axenovich TI Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Jun; 31(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 17500037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximum likelihood haplotyping for general pedigrees. Fishelson M; Dovgolevsky N; Geiger D Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 15802921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data]. Sergeev AS; Arapova RK Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems. Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating genotyping uncertainty in haplotype frequency estimation in pedigree studies. Zhu WS; Fung WK; Guo J Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 17536211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers. Egeland T; Sheehan N Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data. Butler K; Field C; Herbinger CM; Smith BR Mol Ecol; 2004 Jun; 13(6):1589-600. PubMed ID: 15140101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving estimates of genetic maps: a maximum likelihood approach. Stewart WC; Thompson EA Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16984314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster. Leclair B; Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Fourney RM J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 15461094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination. Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations. Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating genealogies from unlinked marker data: a Bayesian approach. Gasbarra D; Pirinen M; Sillanpää MJ; Salmela E; Arjas E Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Nov; 72(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17681576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping a quantitative trait locus via the EM algorithm and Bayesian classification. Ghosh S; Majumder PP Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Sep; 19(2):97-126. PubMed ID: 10962473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues. Krawczak M Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction. Cowell RG; Mostad P J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1239-48. PubMed ID: 14640266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]