BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19781734)

  • 1. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of transmembrane pressure and feed concentration on the retention of arsenic, chromium and cadmium from water by nanofiltration.
    Babaee Y; Mousavi SM; Danesh S; Baratian A
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of concentrated arsenic(V) solutions by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with high molecular weight cut-off membrane.
    Beolchini F; Pagnanelli F; De Michelis I; Vegliò F
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Sep; 148(1-2):116-21. PubMed ID: 17367924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental study of arsenic removal by direct contact membrane distillation.
    Qu D; Wang J; Hou D; Luan Z; Fan B; Zhao C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Apr; 163(2-3):874-9. PubMed ID: 18783884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes.
    Benitez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; Garcia C
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 18947854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomaterial based approach for arsenic removal from water.
    Al Rmalli SW; Harrington CF; Ayub M; Haris PI
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Apr; 7(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 15798792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
    Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nanofiltration processes applied to the removal of phenyl-ureas in natural waters.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; García C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):714-23. PubMed ID: 19054613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separation of furfural from monosaccharides by nanofiltration.
    Qi B; Luo J; Chen X; Hang X; Wan Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(14):7111-8. PubMed ID: 21570829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF).
    Iqbal J; Kim HJ; Yang JS; Baek K; Yang JW
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(5):970-6. PubMed ID: 16884764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
    Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of pressure-driven membrane technologies for the removal of arsenic from drinking water].
    Li X; Hu B; Gu P
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2007 May; 36(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 17712970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater by solar-driven membrane distillation using three different commercial membranes.
    Pal P; Manna AK
    Water Res; 2010 Nov; 44(19):5750-60. PubMed ID: 20579681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boron removal from aqueous solution by direct contact membrane distillation.
    Hou D; Wang J; Sun X; Luan Z; Zhao C; Ren X
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):613-9. PubMed ID: 20080336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater by solar-driven membrane distillation.
    Manna AK; Sen M; Martin AR; Pal P
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Mar; 158(3):805-11. PubMed ID: 19883961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of arsenic and humic substances (HSs) by electro-ultrafiltration (EUF).
    Weng YH; Chaung-Hsieh LH; Lee HH; Li KC; Huang CP
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Jun; 122(1-2):171-6. PubMed ID: 15943938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.