BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19781897)

  • 1. Best interests at end of life: a review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
    Sibbald RW; Chidwick P
    J Crit Care; 2010 Mar; 25(1):171.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19781897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best interests at end of life: an updated review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
    Chidwick P; Sibbald R; Hawryluck L
    J Crit Care; 2013 Feb; 28(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23228726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician perspectives on legal processes for resolving end-of-life disputes.
    Chidwick P; Sibbald R
    Healthc Q; 2011; 14(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 21841397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Everything has been tried and his heart can't recover…": A Descriptive Review of "Do Everything!" in the Archive of Ontario Consent and Capacity Board.
    Yim H; Hashmi SS; Dewar B; Dyason C; Kyeremanteng K; Lamb S; Shamy M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 35761229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical failings of CPSO policy and the health care consent act: case review.
    Landry JT; Patel R; Neilipovitz D; Kyeremanteng K; D'Egidio G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 30890158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The beneficial role of a judicial process when "everything" is too much?
    Handelman M; Parke B
    Healthc Q; 2008; 11(4):46-50. PubMed ID: 18818529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.
    Vig EK; Taylor JS; Starks H; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Nov; 54(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17087695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived.
    Wrigley A
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Sep; 33(9):527-31. PubMed ID: 17761821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decisions about life-sustaining measures in children: in whose best interests?
    Cornfield DN; Kahn JP
    Acta Paediatr; 2012 Apr; 101(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 22103464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The standard of care and conflicts at the end of life in critical care: lessons from medical-legal crossroads and the role of a quasi-judicial tribunal in decision-making.
    Hawryluck L; Sibbald R; Chidwick P
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 23891135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fleming v. Reid.
    Canada. Ontario. Court of Appeal
    Dom Law Rep; 1991 Jun; 82():298-320. PubMed ID: 12041088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit.
    Luce JM
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Jul; 182(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 20194809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for resolving disagreement during end of life care in the critical care unit.
    Choong K; Cupido C; Nelson E; Arnold DM; Burns K; Cook D; Meade M;
    Clin Invest Med; 2010 Aug; 33(4):E240-53. PubMed ID: 20691142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mental Capacity Law, Autonomy, and best Interests: An Argument for Conceptual and Practical Clarity in the Court of Protection.
    Coggon J
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(3):396-414. PubMed ID: 28007810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions.
    Nolan MT; Hughes M; Narendra DP; Sood JR; Terry PB; Astrow AB; Kub J; Thompson RE; Sulmasy DP
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53. PubMed ID: 16256898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re Martin.
    Michigan. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1993 Jul; 504():917-28. PubMed ID: 12041148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Mental Capacity Act 2005: a new framework for healthcare decision making.
    Johnston C; Liddle J
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17264196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protocol for the Assessment of Patient Capacity to Make End-of-Life Treatment Decisions.
    Stuart RB; Thielke S
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2018 Feb; 19(2):106-109. PubMed ID: 29287691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Care of Patients at the End of Life: Surrogate Decision Making for Incapacitated Patients.
    Patel AV; Ackermann RJ
    FP Essent; 2016 Aug; 447():32-41. PubMed ID: 27490071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician Approaches to Conflict with Families Surrounding End-of-Life Decision-making in the Intensive Care Unit. A Qualitative Study.
    Mehter HM; McCannon JB; Clark JA; Wiener RS
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2018 Feb; 15(2):241-249. PubMed ID: 29099239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.